7 C.F.R. § 1000.3
Route disposition
Route disposition means a delivery to a retail or wholesale outlet (except a plant), either directly or through any distribution facility (including disposition from a plant store, vendor, or vending machine) of a fluid milk product in consumer-type packages or dispenser units classified as Class I milk.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1975–1998 · leading case: Gore Inc. v. Glickman, 137 F.3d 863 (5th Cir. 1998).
Gore Inc. v. Glickman, 137 F.3d 863 (5th Cir. 1998). “Moreover, the Secretary of Agriculture, to whom Congress has delegated responsibility for administration of the Act, and the market administrator, who is selected by the Secretary, 7 C.F.R. § 1000.3 (1997), are acting here simply as administrators of the Act and as managers of…”
Gore, Inc., D/B/A Pure Milk Co. v. Michael Espy, as Sec'y of U.S. Dep't of Agric., 87 F.3d 767 (5th Cir. 1996). “7 C.F.R. § 1000.3 (1995). 22 . 7 C.F.R. §§ 1126.”
Marigold Foods, Inc. v. Redalen, 834 F. Supp. 1163 (D. Minnesota 1993). “7 C.F.R. § 1000.3 . For administrative and price setting purposes, the country is divided into 41 milk order areas.”
United States v. Melenyzer, 390 F. Supp. 960 (W.D. Pa. 1975). “9 of the Order and so defies the powers and duties of the market administrator as these are clearly vested in him by 7 C.F.R. § 1000.3 . I am not here required to decide whether or not the Market Administrator has made an arbitrary and capricious determination.”
Gore, Inc. v. Espy (5th Cir. 1996). “7 C.F.R. § 1000.3 (1995). 22 7 C.F.R. §§ 1126.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.