7 C.F.R. § 11.1

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of this part:

Adverse decision means an administrative decision made by an officer, employee, or committee of an agency that is adverse to a participant. The term includes a denial of equitable relief by an agency or the failure of an agency to issue a decision or otherwise act on the request or right of the participant within timeframes specified by agency program statutes or regulations or within a reasonable time if timeframes are not specified in such statutes or regulations. The term does not include a decision over which the Board of Contract Appeals has jurisdiction.

Agency means:

(1) The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC);

(2) The Farm Service Agency (FSA);

(3) The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC);

(4) The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS);

(5) The Risk Management Agency (RMA);

(6) The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS);

(7) Rural Development (RD);

(8) The Rural Housing Service (RHS);

(9) The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) (but not for programs authorized by the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 or the Rural Telephone Bank Act, 7 U.S.C. 901 et seq.);

(10) A State, county, or area committee established under section 8(b)(5) of the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act (16 U.S.C. 590h (b)(5)); and

(11) Any predecessor or successor agency to the above-named agencies, and any other agency or office of the Department which the Secretary may designate.

Agency record means all the materials maintained by an agency related to an adverse decision which are submitted to the Division by an agency for consideration in connection with an appeal under this part, including all materials prepared or reviewed by the agency during its consideration and decisionmaking process, but shall not include records or information not related to the adverse decision at issue. All materials contained in the agency record submitted to the Division shall be deemed admitted as evidence for purposes of a hearing or a record review under § 11.8.

Agency representative means any person, whether or not an attorney, who is authorized to represent the agency in an administrative appeal under this part.

Appeal means a written request by a participant asking for review by the National Appeals Division of an adverse decision under this part.

Appellant means any participant who appeals an adverse decision in accordance with this part. Unless separately set forth in this part, the term “appellant” includes an authorized representative.

Authorized representative means any person, whether or not an attorney, who is authorized in writing by a participant, consistent with § 11.6(c), to act for the participant in an administrative appeal under this part. The authorized representative may act on behalf of the participant except when the provisions of this part require action by the participant or appellant personally.

Case record means all the materials maintained by the Secretary related to an adverse decision: The case record includes both the agency record and the hearing record.

Days means calendar days unless otherwise specified.

Department means the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Director means the Director of the Division or a designee of the Director.

Division means the National Appeals Division established by this part.

Equitable relief means relief which is authorized under section 326 of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1962 (7 U.S.C. 1339a) and other laws administered by the agency.

Ex parte communication means an oral or written communication to any officer or employee of the Division with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but it shall not include requests for status reports, or inquiries on Division procedure, in reference to any matter or proceeding connected with the appeal involved.

Hearing, except with respect to § 11.5, means a proceeding before the Division to afford a participant the opportunity to present testimony or documentary evidence or both in order to have a previous determination reversed and to show why an adverse determination was in error.

Hearing Officer means an individual employed by the Division who conducts the hearing and determines appeals of adverse decisions by any agency.

Hearing record means all documents, evidence, and other materials generated in relation to a hearing under $11.8.

Implement means the taking of action by an agency of the Department in order fully and promptly to effectuate a final determination of the Division.

Participant means any individual or entity who has applied for, or whose right to participate in or receive, a payment, loan, loan guarantee, or other benefit in accordance with any program of an agency to which the regulations in this part apply is affected by a decision of such agency. The term does not include persons whose claim(s) arise under:

(1) Programs subject to various proceedings provided for in 7 CFR part 1;

(2) Programs governed by Federal contracting laws and regulations (appealable under other rules and to other forums, including to the Department's Board of Contract Appeals under 7 CFR part 24);

(3) The Freedom of Information Act (appealable under 7 CFR part 1, subpart A);

(4) Suspension and debarment disputes, including, but not limited to, those falling within the scope of 7 CFR part 1407 and 2 CFR part 417;

(5) Export programs administered by the Commodity Credit Corporation;

(6) Disputes between reinsured companies and the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation;

(7) Tenant grievances or appeals prosecutable under the provisions of 7 CFR part 1944, subpart L, under the multi-family housing program carried out by RHS;

(8) Personnel, equal employment opportunity, and other similar disputes with any agency or office of the Department which arise out of the employment relationship;

(9) The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2671 et seq., or the Military Personnel and Civilian Employees Claims Act of 1964, 31 U.S.C. 3721;

(10) Discrimination complaints prosecutable under the nondiscrimination regulations at 7 CFR parts 15, 15a, 15b, 15e, and 15f; or

(11) Section 361, et seq., of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1361, et seq.) involving Tobacco Marketing Quota Review Committees.

Record review means an appeal considered by the Hearing Officer in which the Hearing Officer's determination is based on the agency record and other information submitted by the appellant and the agency, including information submitted by affidavit or declaration.

Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture.

[64 FR 33373, June 23, 1999, as amended at 85 FR 31938, May 28, 2020]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 20 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: St. Bernard Par. Gov't v. United States, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

St. Bernard Par. Gov't v. United States, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “Tracking the statute, the regulations are specifically made applicable to the NRCS, see 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.1 (4), 614.3(a)(2)(ii), and they set out the procedures to be followed in both formal and informal hearings.”

Mahon v. United States Dep't of Agric., 485 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “The NAD’s responsibilities include the adjudication of appeals from adverse decisions by the CCC, the FSA, and the FSA State, county, and area committees, see 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 (2002) (defining the term, “agency” as including local committees), including appeals from the “[d]enial…”

Austin v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 776 (Fed. Cl. 2014). · cites it 3× “7 C.F.R. § 11.1 . The statute defines the terms “adverse decision” and “agency,” as follows: For purposes of this subchapter: (1) Adverse decision The term “adverse decision” means an administrative decision made by an officer, employee, or committee of an agency that is adverse…”

Huff v. Vilsack, 195 F. Supp. 3d 343 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “]” 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 . 7 . Technically, the Director's authorized desig-nee issued this decision.”

Allied Home Mortg. Capital Corp. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 769 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 7× “The defendant argues that pursuant to the Reorganization Act and the enabling regulations, 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 , et seq. (2010), United States District Courts possess exclusive jurisdiction to entertain claims, such as those presented by plaintiff Allied, which arise from…”

Bartlett v. United States Dep't of Agric., 716 F.3d 464 (8th Cir. 2013). “§ 6996 ; 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.1 ; 11.6; 11.8. The hearing officer’s decision on the merits could then be appealed to the NAD Director, and the Director’s decision on the merits then would become a final agency action subject to judicial review in accordance with the Administrative…”

Enter. Nat'l Bank v. Vilsack, 568 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 6996 (a) (right to appeal adverse decision to Division); 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 (6) (adverse decision includes Rural Business-Cooperative Service decision).”

McBride Cotton & Cattle Corp. v. Veneman, 290 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2002). “Notwithstanding the Secretary’s view, in May 1999 the National Appeals Division issued a suspension order finding that the administrative offset against McBride Cotton constituted an "adverse decision” under 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 , and that its appeal was appropriate.”

Green v. United States Ex Rel. Dep't of Agric., 8 F. Supp. 2d 983 (W.D. Mich. 1998). “” 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 . The regulation requires the decision-maker to inform the applicant of whether the decision is appealable, but the determination regarding the appealability of a decision is left largely to the discretion of the decision-maker.”

Harriman v. United States Dep't of Agric., 99 F. Supp. 2d 105 (D. Me. 2000). “That subchapter and its implementing regulations, see 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.1 - 11.33, concern administrative and judicial appeals of administrative decisions, and neither implicitly nor explicitly provide for compensation by the federal government.”

Daniels v. Farm Serv. Agency (M.D. Ala. 2023). · cites it 2× “§§ 6991–7002; 7 C.F.R. §§ 11.1 , 11.3. of two hearings in March 2021, an administrative judge heard testimony regarding Brittany’s role in the family farm operations and Harvey’s explanation that the Veazey Plant Company receipt was in Chris Grainger’s name “because the…”

Mahon v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., 426 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (M.D. Fla. 2006). · cites it 2× “This 7 day delivery time does not appear to be contemplated by the regulations, therefore the Court does not use this time in its calculations.”

Show all 20 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.