7 U.S.C. § 901
FINDINGS.
“Because of the unique and special needs of equine being transported to slaughter, Congress finds that it is appropriate for the Secretary of Agriculture to issue guidelines for the regulation of the commercial transportation of equine for slaughter by persons regularly engaged in that activity within the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1940–2023 · leading case: Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375 (1983).
Arkansas Elec. Coop. Corp. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 375 (1983). “1363 , 7 U. S. C. § 901 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
United States v. Cajun Elec. Power Coop., Inc., 109 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 1997). “DENNIS, Circuit Judge: Under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., (“RE Act”) the Secretary of Agriculture (“Secretary”) is empowered to make and guarantee loans to wholesale power supply borrowers that generate electric energy for retail…”
City of Santa Maria v. Adam, 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20241 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “hat any such contract [shall require repayment to the United States under specified terms]: Provided further, That in said sales or leases preference shall be given to municipalities and other public corporations or agencies; and also to cooperatives and other nonprofit…”
Pamela Caver v. Cent. Alabama Elec. Coop., 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017). “7 U.S.C. § 901 . By passing the RE Act, Congress affirmed the creation of the REA and authorized the REA to make loans “for rural electrification and the furnishing of electric energy to persons in rural areas.”
Tri-Cnty. Elec. Ass'n v. City of Gillette, 584 P.2d 995 (Wyo. 1978). “Tri-County, according to its articles of incorporation and other data in the record, is an association organized to serve its members, not the public, and for the benefit of the rural community, pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act, 7 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., and is financed…”
Alabama Power Co. v. Alabama Elec. Coop., Inc., 394 F.2d 672 (5th Cir. 1968). “2d 686 , 700: “Congress has steadfastly refused to provide judicial review under 7 U.S.C. § 901 of the REA Act. 26 This silence could be premised on the concern that the private supplier could otherwise interfere with REA loans in each instance where the Administrator finds the…”
Rural Electrification Admin. v. N. States Power Co., 373 F.2d 686 (8th Cir. 1967). “Pursuant to statute ( 7 U.S.C.A. § 901 ) Administrator of REA is empowered to make loans to cooperative associations for construction and operation of generating plants and transmission lines for furnishing of electrical energy to persons in rural areas who are not receiving…”
Greensboro Lumber Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 643 F. Supp. 1345 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “The REA was established in 1935 by Executive Order to “initiate, formulate, administer and supervise a program of approved projects with respect to the generation, transmission and distribution of electric energy in rural areas.”
Tallahatchie Valley Elec. Power Ass'n v. MISS. PROPANE GAS Ass'n, INC., 812 So. 2d 912 (Miss. 2002). “7 U.S.C.A. §§ 901 et seq. ("federal rural electrification laws").”
William Willis, III v. Dixie Elec. Power Assn, 926 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 2019). “1363 (codified at 7 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq. ). The REA was originally established by executive order.”
Brazos Elec. Power Coop., Inc. v. United States, Dep't of Agric. & Rural Utils. Serv., & Texas Utils. Elec. Co., 144 F.3d 784 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “BACKGROUND Brazos is a Texas “generation and transmission cooperative” formed pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 901 -950aa (1994), and the Texas Electric Cooperative Corporation Act, Tex.”
City of Joliet, Ill. v. New West, LP, 562 F.3d 830 (7th Cir. 2009). “) As HUD sees things, the decisions of the fifth and ninth circuits show that local condemnation powers are incompatible with federally subsidized financing designed to achieve a federal goal (whether providing electricity to farms or housing to low-income renters).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.