C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER XVIII—RURAL HOUSING SERVICE, RURAL BUSINESS-COOPERATIVE SERVICE, AND RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER H—PROGRAM REGULATIONS › PART 1900—GENERAL › Subpart B—Adverse Decisions and Administrative Appeals

7 C.F.R. § 1900.51

Definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Act means the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Public Law No. 103-354 (7 U.S.C. 6991 et seq.).

Agency means the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), the Rural Housing Service (RHS), and the Rural Business-Cooperative Development Service (RBS), or their successor agencies.

Refer to 7 CFR 11.1 for other definitions applicable to appeals of adverse decisions covered by this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–1995 · leading case: William G. Parker & Julia Parker v. United States Dep't of Agric., Richard Lyng, Sec'y Lawrence Mashburn & Union Nat'l Bank, 879 F.2d 1362 (6th Cir. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
William G. Parker & Julia Parker v. United States Dep't of Agric., Richard Lyng, Sec'y Lawrence Mashburn & Union Nat'l Bank, 879 F.2d 1362 (6th Cir. 1989). “7 C.F.R. § 1900.51 (emphasis added). According to the plain language of these sections, both the lender and the borrower must challenge the rejection of an application for a loan guarantee.”
Matzke v. Block, 542 F. Supp. 1107 (D. Kan. 1982). “Stoss exercised her appeal rights under regulations promulgated by the Department of Agriculture, 7 C.F.R. § 1900.51 -.54 (1980). The record of her appeal was not provided to the court, nor did the government rebut her testimony.”
Gleichman v. US Dept. of Agric., 896 F. Supp. 42 (D. Me. 1995). “; 7 C.F.R. §§ 1900.51 et seq. I disagree. The term "administrative appeal procedures" is an all-encompassing generic term.”
Wohlford v. United States, 823 F. Supp. 386 (W.D. Va. 1992). · cites it 3× “Count Four In their fourth claim, the Wohlfords argue that 7 C.F.R. §§ 1900.51 et seq., specifically §§ 1900.”
Rubin Hudson, Edward Fant, Individually & on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Farmers Home Admin., 654 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1981). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 1900.51 et seq. Mr. Fant made no use of these procedures whatever.”
United States v. Shields, 733 F. Supp. 776 (D. Vt. 1989). “See 7 C.F.R. § 1900.51 et seq. The regulations in effect when the FmHA decided to accelerate the Shields’ loan and commence foreclosure proceedings required written notice to the Shields of whatever appeal rights they possessed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.