C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER II—FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER A—CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS › PART 210—NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM › Subpart B—Reimbursement Process for States and School Food Authorities

7 C.F.R. § 210.6

Use of Federal funds

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

General. State agencies shall use Federal funds made available under the Program to reimburse or make advance payments to school food authorities in connection with lunches and meal supplements served in accordance with the provisions of this part; except that, with the approval of FNS, any State agency may reserve an amount up to one percent of the funds earned in any fiscal year under this part for use in carrying out special developmental projects. Advance payments to school food authorities may be made at such times and in such amounts as are necessary to meet the current fiscal obligations. All Federal funds paid to any State in place of donated foods shall be used as provided in part 240 of this chapter.

[53 FR 29147, Aug. 2, 1988, as amended at 58 FR 42487, Aug. 10, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1969–1970 · leading case: Briggs v. Kerrigan, 307 F. Supp. 295 (D. Mass. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Briggs v. Kerrigan, 307 F. Supp. 295 (D. Mass. 1969). · cites it 3× “§ 1756 , 7 C.F.R. § 210.6 (a). Thus under both the apportionment section (§ 1753) and this matching section (§ 1756) the assistance need rate comes in to provide *297 the poorer states greater proportional assistance than the wealthier states.”
Archie Briggs v. John T. Kerrigan, Bonnie Fay v. Ray Gauthier, 431 F.2d 967 (1st Cir. 1970). “§ 1759a with 7 C.F.R. § 210.6 (b), providing additional facilities would require substantial expenditures of scarce local funds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.