7 C.F.R. § 272.6

Nondiscrimination compliance

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Requirement. State agencies shall not discriminate against any applicant or participant in any aspect of program administration, including, but not limited to, the certification of households, the issuance of coupons, the conduct of fair hearings, or the conduct of any other program service for reasons of age, race, color, sex, disability, religious creed, national origin, or political beliefs. Discrimination in any aspect of program administration is prohibited by these regulations, the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112, section 504), Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101) and title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d). Enforcement action may be brought under any applicable Federal law. Title VI complaints shall be processed in accord with 7 CFR part 15.

(b) Right to file a complaint. Individuals who believe that they have been subject to discrimination as specified in paragraph (a) of this section may file a written complaint with the Secretary or the Administrator, FNS, Washington, DC 20250, and/or with the State agency, if the State agency has a system for processing discrimination complaints. The State agency shall explain both the FNS and, if applicable, the State agency complaint system to each individual who expresses an interest in filing a discrimination complaint and shall advise the individual of the right to file a complaint in either or both systems.

(i) The name, address, and telephone number or other means of contacting the person alleging discrimination.

(ii) The location and name of the organization or office which is accused of discriminatory practices.

(iii) The nature of the incident or action or the aspect of program administration that led the person to allege discrimination.

(iv) The reason for the alleged discrimination (age, race, color, sex, handicap, religious creed, national origin, or political belief).

(v) The names, titles (if appropriate), and addresses of persons who may have knowledge of the alleged discriminatory acts.

(vi) The date or dates on which the alleged discriminatory actions occurred.

(2) If a complainant makes allegations verbally and is unable or is reluctant to put the allegations in writing, the FNS employee to whom the allegations are made shall document the complaint in writing. Every effort shall be made by the individual accepting the complaint to have the complainant provide the information specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.

(3) Complaints will be accepted by the Secretary or the Administrator, FNS, even if the information specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section is not complete. However, investigations will be conducted only if information concerning paragraphs (c)(1) (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this section is provided.

(4) A complaint must be filed no later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination. However, the time for filing may be extended by the Secretary.

(d) State agency complaint requirements. (1) The State agency may develop and use a State agency complaint system.

(2) The State agency shall submit to FNS a report on each discrimination complaint processed at the State level. The report shall contain as much information in paragraph (c)(1) of this section as is available to the State agency, the findings of the investigation, and, if appropriate, the corrective action planned or taken.

(e) Reviews. [Reserved]

(f) Public notification. The State agency shall: (1) Publicize the procedures described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, and, if applicable, the State agency's complaint procedures; (2) insure that all offices involved in administering the program and that also serve the public display the nondiscrimination poster provided by FNS; and (3) insure that participants and other low-income households have access to information regarding nondiscrimination statutes and policies, complaint procedures, and the rights of participants, within 10 days of the date of a request.

(g) Data collection. The State agency must obtain racial and ethnic data on participating households in the manner specified by FNS. The application form must clearly indicate that the information is voluntary, that it will not affect the eligibility or the level of benefits, and that the reason for the information is to assure that program benefits are distributed without regard to race, color, or national origin. The State agency must develop alternative means of collecting the ethnic and racial data on households when the information is not provided voluntarily by the household on the application form. These alternative means of data collection shall not include observation (also known as visual observation).

(h) Reports. As required by FNS, the State agency must report the racial and ethnic data on participating household contacts on forms or formats provided by FNS.

[Amdt. 132, 43 FR 47884, Oct. 17, 1979. Redesignated by Amdt. 211, 47 FR 53315, Nov. 26, 1982, as amended by Amdt. 356, 59 FR 29713, June 9, 1994; 71 FR 28763, May 18, 2006; 76 FR 27606, May 12, 2011; 88 FR 86566, Dec. 14, 2023]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 22 cases, 1972–2001 · leading case: James T. Cross v. United States, 512 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

James T. Cross v. United States, 512 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1975). · cites it 6× “7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a). Disqualification is decided on the basis of information gathered by FNS, except that the retailer is given notice of the charges against him and afforded the opportunity “to submit to FNS information, explanation, or evidence concerning any instances of…”

Elsie Inez Goodman, Owner Goodman's Drive-In Grocery v. United States, 518 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1975). · cites it 4× “7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1975). The critical issue on this appeal is whether the judicial review provision of the Food Stamp Act precludes review of the sanction imposed under 7 C.”

Bush v. United States, 473 F. Supp. 715 (E.D. Pa. 1979). · cites it 4× “§ 2022 and 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 . These sections provide that FNS may impose a period of disqualification on participating firms found to have violated the Food Stamp Act or the implementing regulations, and that the period of disqualification may not exceed three years.”

Donald Kulkin, Etc. v. Robert Bergland, 626 F.2d 181 (1st Cir. 1980). “6 (a) (1979); 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1978). Section 2013(c) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to “issue such regulations consistent with [the Act] as the Secretary deems necessary or appropriate for the effective and efficient administration of the food stamp program 6 .”

William L. Martin v. United States, 459 F.2d 300 (6th Cir. 1972). · cites it 2× “7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a). . 7 U.S.C. § 2013 (a).”

Willy's Grocery v. United States, 656 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1981). “Under the regulation applicable to this case, 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1978) (current version at 7 C.”

Harry L. Welch, T/a Harry Welch Gen. Merch. v. United States, 464 F.2d 682 (4th Cir. 1972). · cites it 3× “7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1971). As the government concedes in its brief, neither the Act nor the regulation grants a merchant an evidentiary hearing in the administrative process, either initially or on review.”

Keith Nowicki, D/B/A K & F Food Mkt. v. United States, 536 F.2d 1171 (7th Cir. 1976). “Pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1976), the maximum period of disqualification is three years.”

Smith v. United States, 392 F. Supp. 1116 (W.D. La. 1975). · cites it 5× “Disqualification of a retail grocer follows a definite procedure as set forth in 7 C.F.R. 272.6, 272.8, and Part 273. Disqualification travels the following path: I.”

Ameira Corp. v. Veneman, 169 F. Supp. 2d 432 (M.D.N.C. 2001). · cites it 2× “” 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (b). The FNS then determines whether a violation has occurred and imposes a sanction based on the charge letter, the retailer’s response, and any other information available to it.”

J.C.B. Super Markets, Inc. v. United States of Am., & United States Dep't of Agric., 530 F.2d 1119 (2d Cir. 1976). “Since we find that the court below properly sustained the violations charged, we have no reason to review the penalty which was well within the three-year period fixed by the regulatory provision, 7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a). Whether the district court had jurisdiction in the first…”

Miller v. United States, Dept. of Agric., F. & N. Serv., 345 F. Supp. 1131 (W.D. Pa. 1972). “§ 2020 authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to provide for periods of disqualification; the regulation implementing this section is 7 C.F.R. 272.6(a) which allows suspensions up to three years.”

Show all 22 citing cases →

— 7 C.F.R. § 272.6(a) — 2 cases

Harry L. Welch, T/a Harry Welch Gen. Merch. v. United States, 464 F.2d 682 (4th Cir. 1972). “7 C.F.R. § 272.6 (a) (1971). As the government concedes in its brief, neither the Act nor the regulation grants a merchant an evidentiary hearing in the administrative process, either initially or on review.”

— 7 C.F.R. § 272.6(b) — 1 case

Michael Levy D/B/A Mike's Mkt. v. United States, 477 F.2d 916 (6th Cir. 1973).

— 7 C.F.R. § 272.6(d) — 1 case

Smith v. United States, 392 F. Supp. 1116 (W.D. La. 1975). “Disqualification of a retail grocer follows a definite procedure as set forth in 7 C.F.R. 272.6, 272.8, and Part 273. Disqualification travels the following path: I.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.