C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER II—FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER C—SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE AND FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM › PART 279—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW—FOOD RETAILERS AND FOOD WHOLESALERS › Subpart B—Judicial Review

7 C.F.R. § 279.8

Implementation of amendments relating to administrative and judicial review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Amendment No. 257. The program change to § 279.3(a)(4) shall be effective September 14, 1984.

(b) Amendment No. 274. The program change of Amendment No. 274 at § 279.10(d) is effective retroactively to December 23, 1985.

(c) Amendment No. 334. The program changes made to part 279 by this amendment are effective February 1, 1992.

[Amdt. 257, 49 FR 32539, Aug. 15, 1984; Amdt. 262, 49 FR 50598, Dec. 31, 1984, as amended by Amdt. 274, 51 FR 18752, May 21, 1986; Amdt. 334, 57 FR 3913, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated at 68 FR 41053, July 10, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–1995 · leading case: TRM, Inc. v. United States, 52 F.3d 941 (11th Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
TRM, Inc. v. United States, 52 F.3d 941 (11th Cir. 1995). “7 C.F.R. § 279.8 (e). As noted above, TRM fully availed itself of this administrative review process.”
Hy Chan Banh, Dba Hoa My Mkt. v. United States, 814 F.2d 1358 (9th Cir. 1987). “See 7 C.F.R. § 279.8 (c). The formula used to calculate penalties is set forth in 7 C.”
Hun Jong Kim v. United States, 822 F. Supp. 107 (E.D.N.Y 1993). “7 C.F.R. § 279.8 . The FNS complied with this section since it reviewed the additional relevant information in the form of the DOH letter and reviewed plaintiffs letter in opposition to the withdrawal.”
Jedatt, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 488 F. Supp. 261 (E.D. Mich. 1980). · cites it 2× “6 (d) (1979), was prior to January 1,1979, but the final determination by the Food Stamp Review Officer was subsequent to January 1, 1979.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.