7 C.F.R. § 7.34
Retention of authority
(a) Nothing in this part will preclude the Secretary, the Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator from administering any or all programs, or exercising other functions delegated to the county committee, State committee, or any employee of such committees.
(b) In exercising this authority, the Secretary, the Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator may designate for such period of time as deemed necessary a person or persons of their choice to be in charge with full authority to carry out the programs or other functions without regard to the normal duties of such committees or employees.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–1996 · leading case: Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Ct. Cl. 1988).
Hedman v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 304 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “, 7 C.F.R. § 7.34 (1984), states that “the determination of the Deputy Administrator is final and not subject to further administrative review.”
Krueger v. Lyng, 927 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir. 1991). “The hearing examiner is to transmit his findings and recommendations to the Deputy Administrator within sixty days from the receipt of the hearing transcript.”
Hedman v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct. 385 (Ct. Cl. 1990). “8 , citing 7 C.F.R. § 7.34 . . Mr. Hedman also argues that the determination of the hearing officer was prima facie arbitrary and capricious because he purportedly failed to consider all of the material facts, namely, the testimony of Raymond Grover, *393 Chairman of the COC.”
Copley v. Elliot, 948 F. Supp. 586 (W.D. Va. 1996). “7 C.F.R. § 7.34 ; Defendants’ Brief at 1-2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.