C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER IX—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › PART 900—GENERAL REGULATIONS › Subpart D—Procedural Requirements Governing Proceedings on Petitions To Modify or To Be Exempted From Marketing Orders

7 C.F.R. § 900.50

Words in the singular form

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–2012 · leading case: Am. Dairy of Evansville, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Sec'y of Agric., 627 F.2d 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Dairy of Evansville, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Sec'y of Agric., 627 F.2d 1252 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “7 C.F.R. § 900.50 -.64 (1979). . See id § 900.”
Horne v. United States Dep't of Agric., 494 F. App'x 774 (9th Cir. 2012). “USDA’s “Rules of Practice Governing Procedures on Petitions to Modify or to Be Exempted from *776 Marketing Orders” (“Rules of Practice”), 7 C.F.R. § 900.50 et seq., provide that a final agency order “shall be filed with the hearing clerk, who shall serve it upon the parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.