8 C.F.R. § 1241.15
Lack of jurisdiction to review other country of removal
The immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals have no jurisdiction to review any determination by officers of the Department of Homeland Security under 8 CFR 241.15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Binyam Kifle v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 507 F. App'x 703 (9th Cir. 2013).
Binyam Kifle v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 507 F. App'x 703 (9th Cir. 2013). “15(b) (noting DHS retains discretion to determine “what constitutes sufficient acceptance”); 8 C.F.R. § 1241.15 (prohibiting an IJ or the BIA from reviewing a determination by DHS under 8 C.”
Cruz-Medina v. Noem (D. Maryland 2025). “” Finally, 8 C.F.R. § 1241.15 provides that “immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals have no jurisdiction to review any determination by officers of the Department of Homeland Security under 8 C.”
A-s-m (BIA 2021). “8 C.F.R. § 1241.15 (2020). However, once the DHS determines the proper country of removal under section 241(b)(2), it “may not remove” an alien to that country if “the alien’s life or freedom would be threatened in that country” on account of a ground protected under section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.