C.F.R. » Title 8 » CHAPTER V—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER B—IMMIGRATION REGULATIONS › PART 1241—APPREHENSION AND DETENTION OF ALIENS ORDERED REMOVED › Subpart A—Post-hearing Detention and Removal

8 C.F.R. § 1241.8

Reinstatement of removal orders

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Applicability. An alien who illegally reenters the United States after having been removed, or having departed voluntarily, while under an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal shall be removed from the United States by reinstating the prior order. The alien has no right to a hearing before an immigration judge in such circumstances. In establishing whether an alien is subject to this section, the immigration officer shall determine the following:

(1) Whether the alien has been subject to a prior order of removal. The immigration officer must obtain the prior order of exclusion, deportation, or removal relating to the alien.

(2) The identity of the alien, i.e., whether the alien is in fact an alien who was previously removed, or who departed voluntarily while under an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal. In disputed cases, verification of identity shall be accomplished by a comparison of fingerprints between those of the previously excluded, deported, or removed alien contained in Service records and those of the subject alien. In the absence of fingerprints in a disputed case the alien shall not be removed pursuant to this paragraph.

(3) Whether the alien unlawfully reentered the United States. In making this determination, the officer shall consider all relevant evidence, including statements made by the alien and any evidence in the alien's possession. The immigration officer shall attempt to verify an alien's claim, if any, that he or she was lawfully admitted, which shall include a check of Service data systems available to the officer.

(b) Notice. If an officer determines that an alien is subject to removal under this section, he or she shall provide the alien with written notice of his or her determination. The officer shall advise the alien that he or she may make a written or oral statement contesting the determination. If the alien wishes to make such a statement, the officer shall allow the alien to do so and shall consider whether the alien's statement warrants reconsideration of the determination.

(c) Order. If the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are met, the alien shall be removed under the previous order of exclusion, deportation, or removal in accordance with section 241(a)(5) of the Act.

(d) Exception for applicants for benefits under section 902 of HRIFA or sections 202 or 203 of NACARA. If an alien who is otherwise subject to this section has applied for adjustment of status under either section 902 of Division A of Public Law 105-277, the Haitian Refugee Immigrant Fairness Act of 1998 (HRIFA), or section 202 of Public Law 105-100, the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), the provisions of section 241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall not apply. The immigration officer may not reinstate the prior order in accordance with this section unless and until a final decision to deny the application for adjustment has been made. If the application for adjustment of status is granted, the prior order shall be rendered moot.

(e) Exception for withholding of removal. If an alien whose prior order of removal has been reinstated under this section expresses a fear of returning to the country designated in that order, the alien shall be immediately referred to an asylum officer for an interview to determine whether the alien has a reasonable fear of persecution or torture pursuant to § 1208.31 of this chapter.

(f) Execution of reinstated order. Execution of the reinstated order of removal and detention of the alien shall be administered in accordance with this part.

[62 FR 10378, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 8495, Feb. 19, 1999; 66 FR 29451, May 31, 2001]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: Garcia-Garcia v. Sessions, 856 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garcia-Garcia v. Sessions, 856 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “; see also 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (a). 4 Despite the transfer to DHS, the statutory responsibilities assigned to the Attorney General that are "indigenous to the functions of the Attorney General" were retained in the Department of Justice.”
Yuen Jin v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “See 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (e); id. § 1208.31. Under the BIA's rulings, however, the former class may not reopen proceedings or submit a new asylum application without showing changed country conditions.”
Alcala v. Holder, 563 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “§ 1231 (a)(5) and 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 , 6 Alcala was subject to reinstatement of his prior order of removal without a hearing before an IJ.”
Jose Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Jefferson Sessions, III, 904 F.3d 349 (5th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “Thus, once an appropriate DHS officer determines that an alien has reentered the country illegally, the alien's original order of removal "is reinstated," and the alien is subject to removal under the terms of the original removal order.”
Claudio Arce v. United States, 899 F.3d 796 (9th Cir. 2018). “8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (e). 6 ANAYA ARCE V. UNITED STATES removal with our court.”
Santos Iraheta-Martinez v. Merrick Garland, 12 F.4th 942 (9th Cir. 2021). “GARLAND reentered the United States illegally after having been removed”); 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (a) (“An alien who illegally reenters the United States after having been removed, or having departed voluntarily, while under an order of exclusion, deportation, or removal shall be…”
Nikolay Kolov v. Merrick B. Garland, 78 F.4th 911 (6th Cir. 2023). “8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (e). When an immigrant seeks withholding-only relief, what (if anything) counts as the “order of removal” and when does it become “final”? Most courts treated an order reinstating the removal order as a distinct “order of removal” even after AEDPA.”
W-c-b, 24 I. & N. Dec. 118 (BIA 2007). · cites it 3× “2 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (a) (2006). The language of the regulation explicitly states that “[t]he alien has no right to a hearing before an immigration judge in such circumstances.”
Jimenez v. Cronen, 317 F. Supp. 3d 626 (D.D.C. 2018). “Junqueira filed his § 2241 petition on February 16, 2018. Originally, he challenged the legality of his detention and ICE's attempts to remove him from the United States before he received a decision on his I-130 and eventual applications for waivers from CIS.”
L-m-p, 27 I. & N. Dec. 265 (BIA 2018). “The applicant expressed a fear of returning to Guatemala and was referred to an asylum officer for a reasonable fear interview pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (e) (2014). The asylum officer concluded that the applicant did have a reasonable fear of persecution, and the matter was…”
Mendoza Becerril v. Holder, 590 F. App'x 101 (2d Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “” 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8 (a); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(5).”
Manuel Melendez Hernandez v. Attorney Gen. United States, 712 F. App'x 206 (3rd Cir. 2017). “1 See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1241.8 (e), 1208.31(e) (providing that an alien whose prior order of removal has been reinstated may seek withholding of removal based on a reasonable fear of persecution or torture).”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.