8 C.F.R. § 212.2

Consent to reapply for admission after deportation, removal or departure at Government expense

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Evidence. Any alien who has been deported or removed from the United States is inadmissible to the United States unless the alien has remained outside of the United States for five consecutive years since the date of deportation or removal. If the alien has been convicted of an aggravated felony, he or she must remain outside of the United States for twenty consecutive years from the deportation date before he or she is eligible to re-enter the United States. Any alien who has been deported or removed from the United States and is applying for a visa, admission to the United States, or adjustment of status, must present proof that he or she has remained outside of the United States for the time period required for re-entry after deportation or removal. The examining consular or immigration officer must be satisfied that since the alien's deportation or removal, the alien has remained outside the United States for more than five consecutive years, or twenty consecutive years in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony as defined in section 101(a)(43) of the Act. Any alien who does not satisfactorily present proof of absence from the United States for more than five consecutive years, or twenty consecutive years in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony, to the consular or immigration officer, and any alien who is seeking to enter the United States prior to the completion of the requisite five- or twenty-year absence, must apply for permission to reapply for admission to the United States as provided under this part. A temporary stay in the United States under section 212(d)(3) of the Act does not interrupt the five or twenty consecutive year absence requirement.

(b) Alien applying to consular officer for nonimmigrant visa or nonresident alien border crossing card. (1) An alien who is applying to a consular officer for a nonimmigrant visa or a nonresident alien border crossing card, must request permission to reapply for admission to the United States if five years, or twenty years if the alien's deportation was based upon a conviction for an aggravated felony, have not elapsed since the date of deportation or removal. This permission shall be requested in the manner prescribed through the consular officer, and may be granted only in accordance with sections 212(a)(9)(A) and 212(d)(3)(A) of the Act and 8 CFR 212.4. However, the alien may apply for such permission by submitting an application on the form designated by USCIS with the fee prescribed in 8 CFR 106.2, in accordance with the form instructions, to the consular officer if that officer is willing to accept the application, and recommends to the district director that the alien be permitted to apply.

(2) The consular officer shall forward the application to the district director with jurisdiction over the place where the deportation or removal proceedings were held.

(c) Special provisions for an applicant for nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15)(K) of the Act. (1) An applicant for a nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15)(K) must:

(i) Be the beneficiary of a valid visa petition approved by the Service; and

(ii) File the application on the form designated by USCIS with the fee prescribed in 8 CFR 106.2, in accordance with the form instructions with the consular officer for permission to reapply for admission to the United States after deportation or removal.

(2) The consular officer must forward the application to the designated USCIS office. If the alien is ineligible on grounds which, upon the applicant's marriage to the United States citizen petitioner, may be waived under section 212 (g), (h), or (i) of the Act, the consular officer must also forward a recommendation as to whether the waiver should be granted.

(d) Applicant for immigrant visa. Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this section, an applicant for an immigrant visa who is not physically present in the United States and who requires permission to reapply must file the waiver request on the form designated by USCIS. Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this section, if the applicant also requires a waiver under section 212(g), (h), or (i) of the Act, he or she must file both waiver requests simultaneously on the forms designated by USCIS with the fees prescribed in 8 CFR 106.2 and in accordance with the form instructions.

(e) Applicant for adjustment of status. An applicant for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act and part 245 of this chapter must request permission to reapply for entry in conjunction with his or her application for adjustment of status. This request is made by filing the application on the form designated by USCIS. If the application under section 245 of the Act has been initiated, renewed, or is pending in a proceeding before an immigration judge, the district director must refer the application to the immigration judge for adjudication.

(f) Applicant for admission at port of entry. An alien may request permission at a port of entry to reapply for admission to the United States within 5 years of the deportation or removal, or 20 years in the case of an alien deported, or removed 2 or more times, or at any time after deportation or removal in the case of an alien convicted of an aggravated felony. The alien must file the , where required, with the DHS officer having jurisdiction over the port of entry. The alien must file the application, where required, with the DHS officer having jurisdiction over the port of entry.

(g) Other applicants. (1) Any applicant for permission to reapply for admission under circumstances other than those described in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section must apply on the form designated by USCIS with the fee prescribed in 8 CFR 106.2 and in accordance with the form instructions.

(2) An alien who is an applicant for parole authorization under 8 CFR 245.15(t)(2) or 8 CFR 245.13(k)(2) and requires consent to reapply for admission after deportation, removal, or departure at Government expense, or a waiver under section 212(g), 212(h), or 212(i) of the Act, must file the requisite waiver form concurrently with the parole request.

(h) Decision. An applicant who has submitted a request for consent to reapply for admission after deportation or removal must be notified of the decision. If the application is denied, the applicant must be notified of the reasons for the denial and of his or her right to appeal as provided in part 103 of this chapter. Except in the case of an applicant seeking to be granted advance permission to reapply for admission prior to his or her departure from the United States, the denial of the application shall be without prejudice to the renewal of the application in the course of proceedings before an immigration judge under section 242 of the Act and this chapter.

(i) Retroactive approval. (1) If the alien filed the application when seeking admission at a port of entry, the approval of the application shall be retroactive to either:

(i) The date on which the alien embarked or reembarked at a place outside the United States; or

(ii) The date on which the alien attempted to be admitted from foreign contiguous territory.

(2) If the alien filed Form I-212 in conjunction with an application for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act, the approval of the application shall be retroactive to the date on which the alien embarked or reembarked at a place outside the United States.

(j) Advance approval. An alien whose departure will execute an order of deportation shall receive a conditional approval depending upon his or her satisfactory departure. However, the grant of permission to reapply does not waive inadmissibility under section 212(a)(9)(A) of the Act resulting from exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings which are instituted subsequent to the date permission to reapply is granted.

[56 FR 23212, May 21, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 25766, May 12, 1999; 65 FR 15854, Mar. 24, 2000; 74 FR 26937, June 5, 2009; 76 FR 53787, Aug. 29, 2011; 85 FR 46922, Aug. 3, 2020; 89 FR 65165, Aug. 9, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 118 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir. 2004).
Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen., 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 18× “He argues that the reinstatement provision should not bar his application because he applied for adjustment of status prior to the initiation of reinstatement proceedings, and he filed an application for consent to reapply under 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 (e). The INS based its denial of…”
Torres-garcia, 23 I. & N. Dec. 866 (BIA 2006). · cites it 18× “Permission To Reapply for Admission Under 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 In Perez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, supra, at 793, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the DHS regulation set forth at 8 C.”
Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 702 F.3d 504 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 10× “Applying a less deferential form of review, we found that the memorandum’s interpreta- tion conflicted with “[t]he regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 ,” which “make the availability of adjustment of status to previ- ously removed aliens explicit.”
Gonzales v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 508 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 10× “8 C.F.R. § 212.2 . A successful applicant receives an “1-212 waiver.”
Delgado v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 11× “Counsel also filed forms applying for adjustment of status (Forms I-485, I-485A), seeking a waiver for Delgado’s inadmissibility due to her presentation of fraudulent documents on May 5, 1999 (Form I-601), and seeking a waiver, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 (e), for her *68…”
Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney Gen., 403 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2005). · cites it 12× “Berrunu-Garcia criticizes the majority’s holding that 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 permits persons previously removed or deported, who illegally reenter the United States, to seek permission to reapply for admission from within the United States.”
Sarango v. Attorney Gen. of United States, 651 F.3d 380 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 11× “11 ; 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 . We reject Sarango’s arguments because the plain language of § 1182(a)(9)(C)(ii) authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security, rather than the Attorney General, to consider consent requests in these circumstances.”
Morales-Izquierdo v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 600 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “This is commonly known as the “ten-year bar” to readmission. When Morales’s application for adjustment of status was pending, however, Morales may have been eligible for a discretionary waiver of inadmissibility, called a “Form 1-212” waiver.”
United States v. Roberto Antonio Marte, 356 F.3d 1336 (11th Cir. 2004). · cites it 11× “His principal contention on appeal is that 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 either authorized his conduct or rendered § 1326 unconstitutionally vague.”
Berrum-Garcia v. Comfort, 390 F.3d 1158 (10th Cir. 2004). · cites it 3× “8 C.F.R. § 212.2 . If the 1-212 is approved, the alien’s inadmissibility is waived, and he is no longer barred from applying for entry to the U.”
CHERUKU v. Attorney Gen. of US, 662 F.3d 198 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 4× “Specifically, Torres-Garcia rejected the contention that the waiver provision of 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 granted discretion to waive inadmissibility under § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i).”
United States v. Sanchez-Milam, 305 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 2002). · cites it 6× “§ 1182 (h)(2); 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 . If the Application was approved by the Attorney General, the INS was required to notify Sanchez of the Attorney General’s consent to Sanchez’s application for reentry.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(8)(la) — 1 case
Mehdi Mashi v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 585 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1978).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(a) — 6 cases
Sarmiento Cisneros v. United States Attorney Gen., 381 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2004).
Wanrong Lin v. Nielsen, 377 F. Supp. 3d 556 (D. Maryland 2019).
Sanchez v. McAleenan (D. Maryland 2020).
Sanchez v. McAleenan (D. Maryland 2020).
United States v. Pszeniczny (2d Cir. 2024).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(b)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Sanchez-Milam, 305 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 2002). “§ 1182 (h)(2); 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 . If the Application was approved by the Attorney General, the INS was required to notify Sanchez of the Attorney General’s consent to Sanchez’s application for reentry.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(b)(4) — 1 case
Konishi, 16 I. & N. Dec. 549 (BIA 1978).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(c) — 2 cases
Vrettakos, 14 I. & N. Dec. 593 (BIA 1974).
Lee, 17 I. & N. Dec. 275 (BIA 1978).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(e) — 4 cases
Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 702 F.3d 504 (9th Cir. 2012). “Applying a less deferential form of review, we found that the memorandum’s interpreta- tion conflicted with “[t]he regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2 ,” which “make the availability of adjustment of status to previ- ously removed aliens explicit.”
Vrettakos, 14 I. & N. Dec. 593 (BIA 1974).
Ovalle v. Chertoff, 546 F. Supp. 2d 333 (W.D. La. 2008).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(f) — 1 case
Ng, 17 I. & N. Dec. 63 (BIA 1979).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(f)(2) — 1 case
Ponce De Leon, 21 I. & N. Dec. 154 (BIA 1996).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(g) — 2 cases
Vrettakos, 14 I. & N. Dec. 593 (BIA 1974).
Ng, 17 I. & N. Dec. 63 (BIA 1979).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(h) — 1 case
Kwun, 13 I. & N. Dec. 457 (BIA 1970).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(i) — 1 case
Ng, 17 I. & N. Dec. 63 (BIA 1979).
— 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) — 2 cases
Calderon v. Sessions, 330 F. Supp. 3d 944 (S.D. Ill. 2018).
Chen v. Barr (2d Cir. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.