Class; Adequacy; Representative

19 issues with Colorado opinions1985–2026

Balancing interests in continued representation despite conflict9 opinions · 1994–2017
Determining class predominance through class-wide theory8 opinions · 2011–2022
Permitting differential class treatment based on reasonable differences8 opinions · 1985–2016
Interpreting discovery scope and discrete subparts5 opinions · 2006–2016
Defining class membership for numerosity requirementthin4 opinions · 2007–2011
Assessing adequacy of class representative's representationthin3 opinions · 2008–2011
Defining active supervision under the midcal testthin3 opinions · 2000–2019
Analyzing typicality and adequacy of class representativesthin2 opinions · 2009–2026
Determining class definiteness before rule 23 analysisthin2 opinions · 2011
Determining class definiteness and numerosity requirementsthin2 opinions · 2007–2009
Classifying traits as immutable versus behavioralthin2 opinions · 1993–2007
Inferring class-wide reliance from class behaviorthin2 opinions · 2011–2014
Assessing adequacy of class representative despite reliance on third partythin1 opinions · 2008
Determining class numerosity under rule 23(a)thin1 opinions · 1991
Determining class typicality despite varying fact situationsthin1 opinions · 2007
Dissenting view on desire to discuss investigationthin1 opinions · 2016
Analyzing class certification and typicality defensesthin1 opinions · 2008
Limiting communications between parties and class membersthin1 opinions · 2002
Determining class representative status and agencythin1 opinions · 2008

Counts are Colorado courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Class; Adequacy; Representative