The supreme court from time to time
may institute rules of practice, and prescribe forms of process to be used, and regulations for the
keeping of the records and proceedings of the court, not inconsistent with the constitution or
laws of this state.
Source: G.L. § 2604. G.S. § 3227. R.S. 08: § 1418. C.L. § 5630. CSA: C. 46, § 21.
CRS 53: § 37-2-9. C.R.S. 1963: § 37-2-9.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2018–2020 · leading case:
Lees v. James, 2018 COA 173.
Lees v. James, 2018 COA 173.
· cites it 2× “2018 (addressing the supreme court’s authority to promulgate rules of criminal procedure); § 13-2-110, C.R.S. 2018 (addressing the supreme court’s power to institute rules of practice and prescribe forms of process to be used).”
Ziankovich v. Members of the Colorado Supreme Court, No. 1:20-cv-00158 (D. Colo. Feb. 13, 2020).
· cites it 5× “However, the Colorado Supreme Court’s ability to “institute rules of practice” under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-2-110 is not limited to practice in courts of record in Colorado.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.