Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-601 (2024)

Contracts pertaining to marijuana enforceable

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the public policy of the state of Colorado that a contract is not void or voidable as against public policy if it pertains to lawful activities authorized by section 16 of article XVIII of the state constitution and article 10 of title 44.

Source: L. 2013: Entire part added, (SB 13-283), ch. 332, p. 1890, § 4, effective May 28. L. 2018: Entire section amended, (HB 18-1023), ch. 55, p. 586, § 9, effective October 1. L. 2019: Entire section amended, (SB 19-224), ch. 315, p. 2936, § 13, effective January 1, 2020.

PART 7 COLORADO PARENTAL NOTIFICATION ACT Editor's note: (1) This part 7 was added with amended and relocated provisions in 2018. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated. For a detailed comparison of this part 7, see the comparative tables located in the back of the index.

(2) (a) This part 7 was originally numbered as article 37.5 of title 12. It was added as an initiated measure that was adopted by the people in the general election held November 3, 1998, effective upon proclamation of the Governor, December 30, 1998.

(b) The vote count on the measure at the general election held November 3, 1998, was as follows: FOR: 708,689 AGAINST: 582,102

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Bartch v. Barch, 111 F. 4th 1043 (10th Cir. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bartch v. Barch, 111 F. 4th 1043 (10th Cir. 2024). “at 80 (recognizing the policy “of preventing people from getting other people’s property for nothing when they purport to be buying it” (quotations omitted)); see also Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-601 (“It is the public policy of the state of Colorado that a contract is not void or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.