Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-51-110 (2024)
When court may refuse
✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The court may refuse to render or enter a declaratory judgment or decree where such judgment or decree, if rendered or entered, would not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding.
Source: L. 23: p. 269, § 6. CSA: C. 93, § 83. CRS 53: § 77-11-6. C.R.S. 1963: § 77-11- 6.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: Zab, Inc. v. Berenergy Corp., 136 P.3d 252 (Colo. 2006).
Zab, Inc. v. Berenergy Corp., 136 P.3d 252 (Colo. 2006). “The limitations of this broad power are recognized in section 13-51-110, C.R.S. (2005). That section states: "The court may refuse to render or enter a declaratory judgment or decree where such judgment or decree, if rendered or entered, would not terminate the uncertainty or…”
In re the Adoption of T.K.J., 931 P.2d 488 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “See § 13-51-110, C.R.S. (1987 Repl. Vol. 6A); see also Armstrong v.”
Berenergy Corp. v. Zab, Inc., 94 P.3d 1232 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Section 13-51-110, C.R.S.2003; C.R.C.P. 57(f).”
Gresh v. Balink, 148 P.3d 419 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “Section 13-51-110, C.R.S.2006; see Colo. Common Cause v.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Park Cnty. Sportsmen's Ranch, LLP, 45 P.3d 693 (Colo. 2002). “§ 13-51-110, 5 C.R.S. (2001); C.R.C.P. 57(f).”
Moss v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Boulder Cnty., 411 P.3d 918 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “" § 13-51-110, C.R.S. 2014; accord C.R.C.P.”
Berenergy Corp. v. Zab, Inc., 94 P.3d 1228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Section 13-51-110, C.R.S.2003; C.R.C.P. 57(f).”
Imeson v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, No. 1:22-cv-02264 (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2023). “1992) (stating that Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-51-110 is a remedial statute calculated to afford parties judicial relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to their rights and legal relations).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.