(1) The district court shall enter its decree declaring the invalidity of a marriage entered into under the following circumstances:
(a) A party lacked capacity to consent to the marriage at the time the marriage was solemnized, either because of mental incapacity or infirmity or because of the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other incapacitating substances.
(b) A party lacked the physical capacity to consummate the marriage by sexual intercourse, and the other party did not at the time the marriage was solemnized know of the incapacity.
(c) A party was under the age as provided by law and did not have the consent of his parents or guardian or judicial approval as provided by law.
(d) One party entered into the marriage in reliance upon a fraudulent act or representation of the other party, which fraudulent act or representation goes to the essence of the marriage.
(e) One or both parties entered into the marriage under duress exercised by the other party or a third party, whether or not such other party knew of such exercise of duress.
(f) One or both parties entered into the marriage as a jest or dare.
(g) The marriage is prohibited by law, including the following:
(I) A marriage entered into prior to the dissolution of an earlier marriage of one of the parties;
(II) A marriage between an ancestor and a descendant or between a brother and a sister, whether the relationship is by the half or the whole blood;
(III) A marriage between an uncle and a niece or between an aunt and a nephew, whether the relationship is by the half or the whole blood, except as to marriages permitted by the established customs of aboriginal cultures;
(IV) A marriage which was void by the law of the place where such marriage was contracted.
(2) A declaration of invalidity under subsection (1) of this section may be sought by any of the following persons and shall be commenced within the times specified, but in no event may a declaration of invalidity be sought after the death of either party to the marriage, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section:
(a) For the reasons set forth in either subsection (1)(a), (1)(d), (1)(e), or (1)(f) of this section, by either party to the marriage who was aggrieved by the conditions or by the legal representative of the party who lacked capacity to consent no later than six months after the petitioner obtained knowledge of the described condition;
(b) For the reason set forth in subsection (1)(b) of this section, by either party no later than one year after the petitioner obtained knowledge of the described condition;
(c) For the reason set forth in subsection (1)(c) of this section, by the underage party, his parent, or his guardian, if such action for declaration of invalidity of marriage is commenced within twenty-four months of the date the marriage was entered into.
(3) A declaration of invalidity, for the reason set forth in subsection (1)(g) of this section, may be sought by either party; by the legal spouse in case of bigamous, polygamous, or incestuous marriages; by the appropriate state official; or by a child of either party at any time prior to the death of either party or prior to the final settlement of the estate of either party and the discharge of the personal representative, executor, or administrator of the estate or prior to six months after an estate is closed under section 15-12-1204, C.R.S.
(4) Repealed.
(5) Marriages declared invalid under this section shall be so declared as of the date of the marriage.
(6) The provisions of this article relating to the property rights of spouses, maintenance, and support of and the allocation of parental responsibilities with respect to the children on dissolution of marriage are applicable to decrees of invalidity of marriage.
(7) No decree shall be entered unless one of the parties has been domiciled in this state for thirty days next preceding the commencement of the proceeding or unless the marriage has been contracted in this state.
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 523, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 46-1-11. L. 73: pp. 553, 1647, §§ 4, 5, 6. L. 80: (1)(g)(II) amended, p. 794, § 47, effective June 5. L. 98: (6) amended, p. 1397, § 38, effective February 1, 1999. L. 2018: (4) repealed, (SB 18-095), ch. 96, p. 754, § 8, effective August 8.
Cross references: (1) For the effect of a declaration of invalidity on marital agreements, see § 14-2-308.
(2) For the legislative declaration in SB 18-095, see section 1 of chapter 96, Session Laws of Colorado 2018.
Notes of Decisions
In re the Marriage of Joel & Roohi, 404 P.3d 1251 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 18× “¶ 10 Section 14-10-111 provides that a court may declare a marriage invalid for a number of reasons.”
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1993).
· cites it 42× “Section 14-10-111, regarding declarations of invalidity, differs from section 208 of the Uniform Act in that section 14-10-111 does not give the court presiding over the annulment proceeding the option of making the annulment prospective only, if such is in the interests of…”
Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.G, 2020 COA 115 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 2× “§ 14-10-111(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. A court shall also declare a marriage invalid when it is prohibited by law for the reasons provided in section 14-2-110.”
In Re the Marriage of Farr, 228 P.3d 267 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 9× “When a marriage is invalidated pursuant to section 14-10-111(1), C.R.S.2009, the provisions of the dissolution of marriage statutes relating to the entry of permanent orders for property division and maintenance apply in the same manner as if the marriage had been dissolved.”
Matter of Est. of Fuller, 862 P.2d 1037 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 15× “Section 14-10-111, C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”
In Re the Marriage of Heinzman, 596 P.2d 61 (Colo. 1979).
· cites it 3× “15(b) and 54(c), and section 14-10-111(6), C.R.S. 1973. 2 William testified that they had a brief separation from May 1971 to July 1971, during which he did not reside at this residence.”
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 826 P.2d 387 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 14× “The trial court found that, pursuant to § 14-10-111(5), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B), a marriage declared invalid is void ab ini-tio.”
In Re the Marriage of Price, 727 P.2d 1073 (Colo. 1986).
· cites it 2× “(1973) (upon request, a court may grant a decree of separation unless objected to by the other party); section 14-10-111, 6 C.R.S. (1973) (in certain circumstances, a court may grant a decree declaring a marriage invalid).”
In Re the Marriage of Dickson, 983 P.2d 44 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “See §14-10-111, C.R.S. 1998 (provisions of Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act relating to rights of spouses, maintenance, and support and custody of children on dissolution of marriage are applicable to decrees of invalidity of marriage).”
Margaret A. Hopkins v. R. James Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 165 (Vet. App. 2005).
“, indicating incestuous marriages are void); see also Colo. Rev.Stat. § 14-10-111(1)(g) (2004) (still recognizing only three types of prohibited marriages).”
Johnston v. Johnston, 592 P.2d 132 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).
“Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111 states: “Declaration of invalidity.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(1) — 2 cases
In Re the Marriage of Farr, 228 P.3d 267 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
“When a marriage is invalidated pursuant to section 14-10-111(1), C.R.S.2009, the provisions of the dissolution of marriage statutes relating to the entry of permanent orders for property division and maintenance apply in the same manner as if the marriage had been dissolved.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(1)(a) — 1 case
Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.G, 2020 COA 115 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“§ 14-10-111(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. A court shall also declare a marriage invalid when it is prohibited by law for the reasons provided in section 14-2-110.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(1)(d) — 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Farr, 228 P.3d 267 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
“When a marriage is invalidated pursuant to section 14-10-111(1), C.R.S.2009, the provisions of the dissolution of marriage statutes relating to the entry of permanent orders for property division and maintenance apply in the same manner as if the marriage had been dissolved.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(1)(g) — 2 cases
Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.G, 2020 COA 115 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“§ 14-10-111(1)(a)-(f), C.R.S. 2019. A court shall also declare a marriage invalid when it is prohibited by law for the reasons provided in section 14-2-110.”
Margaret A. Hopkins v. R. James Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 165 (Vet. App. 2005).
“, indicating incestuous marriages are void); see also Colo. Rev.Stat. § 14-10-111(1)(g) (2004) (still recognizing only three types of prohibited marriages).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(2) — 2 cases
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1993).
“Section 14-10-111, regarding declarations of invalidity, differs from section 208 of the Uniform Act in that section 14-10-111 does not give the court presiding over the annulment proceeding the option of making the annulment prospective only, if such is in the interests of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(3) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(5) — 3 cases
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1993).
“Section 14-10-111, regarding declarations of invalidity, differs from section 208 of the Uniform Act in that section 14-10-111 does not give the court presiding over the annulment proceeding the option of making the annulment prospective only, if such is in the interests of…”
In re the Marriage of Joel & Roohi, 404 P.3d 1251 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
“¶ 10 Section 14-10-111 provides that a court may declare a marriage invalid for a number of reasons.”
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 826 P.2d 387 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).
“The trial court found that, pursuant to § 14-10-111(5), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B), a marriage declared invalid is void ab ini-tio.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-111(6) — 9 cases
In re the Marriage of Joel & Roohi, 404 P.3d 1251 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
“¶ 10 Section 14-10-111 provides that a court may declare a marriage invalid for a number of reasons.”
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1993).
“Section 14-10-111, regarding declarations of invalidity, differs from section 208 of the Uniform Act in that section 14-10-111 does not give the court presiding over the annulment proceeding the option of making the annulment prospective only, if such is in the interests of…”
In Re the Marriage of Heinzman, 596 P.2d 61 (Colo. 1979).
“15(b) and 54(c), and section 14-10-111(6), C.R.S. 1973. 2 William testified that they had a brief separation from May 1971 to July 1971, during which he did not reside at this residence.”
In Re the Marriage of Farr, 228 P.3d 267 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
“When a marriage is invalidated pursuant to section 14-10-111(1), C.R.S.2009, the provisions of the dissolution of marriage statutes relating to the entry of permanent orders for property division and maintenance apply in the same manner as if the marriage had been dissolved.”
In re the Marriage of Cargill, 826 P.2d 387 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).
“The trial court found that, pursuant to § 14-10-111(5), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 6B), a marriage declared invalid is void ab ini-tio.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.