This part 2 shall not apply to the contracts between counties and the department of corrections under which the county agrees to house the backlog of inmates as provided by section 16-11-308.5, C.R.S., which contracts shall be governed by said section. In addition, this part 2 shall not apply to any contract entered into by the department under circumstances where the contract has been reviewed in accordance with section 17-1-105 (2).
Source: L. 95: Entire part added, p. 1271, § 1, effective June 5.
Parole and Probation ARTICLE 2 Correctional Services Editor's note: (1) Prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title in 1977, the substantive provisions of this article were contained in article 1 of this title.
(2) For additional historical information concerning the repeal and reenactment of this title, see the editor's note at the beginning of this title.
Cross references: For the "Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision", see part 28 of article 60 of title 24.
PART 1 DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE Cross references: For home detention programs for parolees, see § 17-27.8-105.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1975–1983 · leading case:
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1099 (Colo. 1980).
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1099 (Colo. 1980).
· cites it 6× “[5] Section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S.1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.”
People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983).
· cites it 6× “Third, it assumes that the twenty-year minimum sentence in section 17-2-207(2) (actually the court should have cited the ten-year minimum sentence in section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S. 1973, see footnote 2, supra) applies regardless of the number of life sentences imposed by the court.”
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1106 (Colo. 1980).
· cites it 6× “" [6] Section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S.1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.”
People v. Bergstrom, 544 P.2d 396 (Colo. 1975).
· cites it 6× “[4] Now section 17-1-207(5), C.R.S.1973. [5] Now section 16-13-101, C.”
People v. Pacheco, 581 P.2d 741 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 2× “Thus, he argues that on his sentence of life imprisonment, he could be eligible for parole in ten years, see § 17-1-207(3), C.R.S. 1973; however, on the sentence imposed on the assault charge, the defendant argues that he would be required to serve fifteen and one-half years…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-1-207(3): 4 cases
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1099 (Colo. 1980).
“[5] Section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S.1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.”
People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983).
“Third, it assumes that the twenty-year minimum sentence in section 17-2-207(2) (actually the court should have cited the ten-year minimum sentence in section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S. 1973, see footnote 2, supra) applies regardless of the number of life sentences imposed by the court.”
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1106 (Colo. 1980).
“" [6] Section 17-1-207(3), C.R.S.1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.”
People v. Pacheco, 581 P.2d 741 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978).
“Thus, he argues that on his sentence of life imprisonment, he could be eligible for parole in ten years, see § 17-1-207(3), C.R.S. 1973; however, on the sentence imposed on the assault charge, the defendant argues that he would be required to serve fifteen and one-half years…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-1-207(5): 1 case
People v. Bergstrom, 544 P.2d 396 (Colo. 1975).
“[4] Now section 17-1-207(5), C.R.S.1973. [5] Now section 16-13-101, C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.