(1) The general assembly finds and declares that, to the extent possible, all inmates should participate in programs that promote successful rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration into the community. Therefore, it is the general assembly's intent to create a division of correctional industries to develop rehabilitation and work programs inside and outside of the department's facilities to promote inmates' successful rehabilitation, reentry, and reintegration into the community.
(2) It is the general assembly's intent that the division of correctional industries collaborate with the department to perform all duties and functions for correctional industries.
Source: L. 77: Entire title R&RE, p. 927, § 10, effective August 1. L. 79: (2) amended, p. 698, § 62, effective July 1. L. 80: IP(1), (1)(a), and (1)(b) amended, p. 525, § 2, effective March 25. L. 2022: Entire section amended, (SB 22-050), ch. 51, p. 241, § 4, effective March 30.
Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 27-25-102 as it existed prior to 1977.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1980–1992 · leading case:
Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F. Supp. 122 (D. Colo. 1980).
Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F. Supp. 122 (D. Colo. 1980).
· cites it 4× “which assumes responsibility for training offenders in general work habits, work skills, and specific training skills that increase their employment prospects when released; (b) Develop industries that provide forty hours of work activity each week for all able-bodied offenders;…”
Rather v. Conte, 849 P.2d 884 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “AVCF Procedure 202-2 provides that: “Supervisors can suspend an inmate for excessive unauthorized absence or for any other posted operational rule violation.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-24-102(1): 1 case
Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F. Supp. 122 (D. Colo. 1980).
“which assumes responsibility for training offenders in general work habits, work skills, and specific training skills that increase their employment prospects when released; (b) Develop industries that provide forty hours of work activity each week for all able-bodied offenders;…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-24-102(l)(a): 1 case
Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F. Supp. 122 (D. Colo. 1980).
“which assumes responsibility for training offenders in general work habits, work skills, and specific training skills that increase their employment prospects when released; (b) Develop industries that provide forty hours of work activity each week for all able-bodied offenders;…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.