Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-27-101.5 (2024)

Purposes of community corrections

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The purpose of this article 27, with respect to community corrections, is to:

(a) Further all purposes of sentencing and improve public safety by reducing the incidence of future crime through design and implementation of research-based policies, practices, programs, and standards;

(b) Prepare, select, and assist people who, after serving a statutorily defined period of incarceration, will be transitioned and returned to the community through supported partnerships with local community corrections boards;

(c) Set individualized conditions of community corrections supervision and provide services and support to assist people in community corrections in addressing identified risks and needs; and

(d) Achieve a successful discharge from community corrections supervision through reduction of risks and needs and satisfactory compliance with conditions of placement.

Source: L. 2017: Entire section added, (HB 17-1147), ch. 82, p. 255, § 1, effective August 9.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: v. Barnett, 2020 COA 167.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
v. Barnett, 2020 COA 167. · cites it 2× “” § 17-27-101.5(1)(a), C.R.S. 2020. ¶ 20 To strictly focus on government employees or entities who, as Barnett claims, receive salaries from taxpayer funds would exclude nongovernment employees who provide a “government function,” contrary to the plain language of the statutory…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-27-101.5(1)(a): 1 case
v. Barnett, 2020 COA 167. “” § 17-27-101.5(1)(a), C.R.S. 2020. ¶ 20 To strictly focus on government employees or entities who, as Barnett claims, receive salaries from taxpayer funds would exclude nongovernment employees who provide a “government function,” contrary to the plain language of the statutory…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.