(1) The department shall establish an intensive supervision parole program for sex offenders sentenced to incarceration and subsequently released on parole pursuant to this part 10. In addition, the parole board may require a person, as a condition of parole, to participate in the intensive supervision parole program established pursuant to this section if the person is convicted of:
(a) Indecent exposure, as described in section 18-7-302;
(b) Criminal attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit any of the offenses specified in section 18-1.3-1003 (5)(a), which attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation would constitute a class 5 felony; or
(c) Any of the offenses specified in section 16-22-102 (9)(j), (9)(k), (9)(l), (9)(n), (9)(o), (9)(p), (9)(q), (9)(r), or (9)(s), C.R.S.
(1.5) In addition to the persons specified in subsection (1) of this section, the parole board shall require, as a condition of parole, any person convicted of felony failure to register as a sex offender, as described in section 18-3-412.5, who is sentenced to incarceration and subsequently released on parole, to participate in the intensive supervision parole program established pursuant to this section.
(2) The department shall require that sex offenders and any other persons in the intensive supervision parole program established pursuant to this section receive the highest level of supervision that is provided to parolees. The intensive supervision parole program may include, but is not limited to, severely restricted activities, daily contact between the sex offender or other person and the community parole officer, monitored curfew, home visitation, employment visitation and monitoring, drug and alcohol screening, treatment referrals and monitoring, including physiological monitoring, and payment of restitution. In addition, the intensive supervision parole program shall be designed to minimize the risk to the public to the greatest extent possible.
(3) The executive director of the department shall establish and enforce standards and criteria for administration of the intensive supervision parole program created pursuant to this section.
Source: L. 2002: Entire article added with relocations, p. 1438, § 2, effective October 1. L. 2008: (2) amended, p. 659, § 13, effective April 25. L. 2012: (1)(c) amended, (HB 12-1310), ch. 268, p. 1402, § 25, effective June 7. Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 16-13-805 as it existed prior to 2002.
Notes of Decisions
Ryals v. City of Englewood, 2016 CO 8, 364 P.3d 900.
· cites it 6× “See § 18-1.3-1005, C.R.S. (2015). The only provision from this statute that deals with sex offender residency provides that âthe division of adult parole shall provide parole supervision and assistance in securing employment, housing, and such other services as may effect…”
In Re The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Michael Anthony MANAOIS, 488 P.3d 1099 (Colo. 2021).
· cites it 2× “sex-related offenses: any felony offense involving "unlawful sexual behavior" or "an underlying factual basis" of such behavior and which resulted in conviction, guilty plea, or nolo contendere plea on or after July 1, 2001 ; and attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation to commit a…”
People v. Montgomery, 2014 COA 166, 342 P.3d 593.
· cites it 2× “2014 (SOLSA's sentencing guidelines); §§ 18-1.3-1005 to-1006, C.R.9$.2014 (SOLSA's parole procedures and conditions); §§ 18-1.”
v. Ehlebracht, 2020 COA 132, 480 P.3d 727.
“§§ 18-1.3-1005(2), 18-1.3-1007(2), C.R.S.”
Stephen Brett Ryals v. City of Englewood., 2016 CO 8.
· cites it 4× “See § 18-1.3-1005, C.R.S. (2015). The only provision from this statute that deals with sex offender residency provides that “the division of adult parole shall provide parole supervision and assistance in securing employment, housing, and such other services as may effect [sic]…”
Melnick v. Raemisch, No. 1:19-cv-00154, 2021 WL 4133919 (D. Colo. Sept. 10, 2021).
· cites it 10× “13); and Claim 15 challenges the constitutionality of the statute governing the parole-intensive supervision program, C.R.S. § 18-1.3-1005. (Doc. # 18, pp. 24-25).”
Melnick v. Gamblin, No. 1:20-cv-02284 (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2023).
· cites it 4× “# 123 at 26–27) as it relates to Plaintiff’s facial challenge to SOLSA (Claim Six), Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-1005 . (Docs. ## 124, 131.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1.3-1005(2): 4 cases
Ryals v. City of Englewood, 2016 CO 8, 364 P.3d 900.
“See § 18-1.3-1005, C.R.S. (2015). The only provision from this statute that deals with sex offender residency provides that âthe division of adult parole shall provide parole supervision and assistance in securing employment, housing, and such other services as may effect…”
v. Ehlebracht, 2020 COA 132, 480 P.3d 727.
“§§ 18-1.3-1005(2), 18-1.3-1007(2), C.R.S.”
Melnick v. Raemisch, No. 1:19-cv-00154, 2021 WL 4133919 (D. Colo. Sept. 10, 2021).
“13); and Claim 15 challenges the constitutionality of the statute governing the parole-intensive supervision program, C.R.S. § 18-1.3-1005. (Doc. # 18, pp. 24-25).”
Stephen Brett Ryals v. City of Englewood., 2016 CO 8.
“See § 18-1.3-1005, C.R.S. (2015). The only provision from this statute that deals with sex offender residency provides that “the division of adult parole shall provide parole supervision and assistance in securing employment, housing, and such other services as may effect [sic]…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.