(1) A permit to carry a concealed handgun or a concealed weapon that is issued by a state that recognizes the validity of permits issued pursuant to this part 2 shall be valid in this state in all respects as a permit issued pursuant to this part 2 if the permit is issued to a person who is:
(a) Twenty-one years of age or older; and
(b) (I) A resident of the state that issued the permit, as demonstrated by the address stated on a valid picture identification that is issued by the state that issued the permit and is carried by the permit holder; or
(II) A resident of Colorado for no more than ninety days, as determined by the date of issuance on a valid picture identification issued by Colorado and carried by the permit holder.
(2) For purposes of this section, a "valid picture identification" means a driver's license or a state identification issued in lieu of a driver's license.
Source: L. 2003: Entire part added, p. 646, § 1, effective May 17. L. 2007: Entire section amended, p. 956, § 1, effective May 17.
Notes of Decisions
Peterson v. Martinez, 707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 8× “The complaint merely states, without any supporting factual allegations, that Davis has a legal duty to enforce Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-213 . Nowhere does the complaint point to a legislative or administrative enactment so empowering Davis.”
Peterson v. LaCABE, 783 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Colo. 2011).
· cites it 4× “C.R.S. § 18-12-213. Plaintiff is a resident of Washington and has a permit issued by the State of Washington but Washington is not among the states with which Colorado grants reciprocity.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-213(1) — 1 case
Peterson v. Martinez, 707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013).
“The complaint merely states, without any supporting factual allegations, that Davis has a legal duty to enforce Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-213 . Nowhere does the complaint point to a legislative or administrative enactment so empowering Davis.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-213(l)(b)(I) — 2 cases
Peterson v. Martinez, 707 F.3d 1197 (10th Cir. 2013).
“The complaint merely states, without any supporting factual allegations, that Davis has a legal duty to enforce Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-213 . Nowhere does the complaint point to a legislative or administrative enactment so empowering Davis.”
Peterson v. LaCABE, 783 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Colo. 2011).
“C.R.S. § 18-12-213. Plaintiff is a resident of Washington and has a permit issued by the State of Washington but Washington is not among the states with which Colorado grants reciprocity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.