No purchaser shall purchase any valuable article from any person under the age of eighteen years.
Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1013, § 1, effective May 22.
18-16-105. Purchaser to maintain register and obtain declaration of seller's ownership. (1) Every purchaser of valuable articles shall keep a register, in a permanent, well- bound book, in which he shall record the following information: The name, address, and date of birth of the seller and his driver's license number or other I.D. number from any other allowed form of identification pursuant to section 18-16-103; the date, time, and place of the purchase; an accurate and detailed account and description of each valuable article being purchased, including, but not limited to, any trademark, identification number, serial number, model number, brand name, or other identifying marks on such articles and a description by weight and design of such articles. The purchaser shall also obtain a written declaration of the seller's ownership which shall state whether the valuable article is totally owned by the seller, how long the seller has owned the article, whether the seller or someone else found the article, and, if the article was found, the details of its finding.
(2) The seller shall sign his name in such register and on the declaration of ownership.
(3) Such register shall be made available to any peace officer for inspection at any reasonable time.
(4) The purchaser shall keep each register for at least three years after the last date of purchase of valuable articles described therein.
Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1013, § 1, effective May 22.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases, 1982–2009 · leading case:
Hall v. Frankel, 190 P.3d 852 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
Hall v. Frankel, 190 P.3d 852 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 8× “Section 18-16-104, C.R.S.2007, and C.R.C.”
Antolovich v. Brown Grp. Retail, Inc., 183 P.3d 582 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 3× “Because homeowners requested costs under § 18-16-104, C.R.S.2006, on remand the trial court should determine whether they are entitled to costs as prevailing parties under § 18-16-104.”
Catlin v. Tormey Bewley Corp., 219 P.3d 407 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 3× “68 in costs as the prevailing party under sections 18-16-104, -122(1), and 13-17-202(1)(a)(I), C.”
Novak v. Craven, 195 P.3d 1115 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 6× “15) exceeded Craven's $25,000 offer of settlement, the trial court determined that (1) *1121 Craven was not entitled to costs under seetion 18-17-202; (2) Novak was not barred from recovering his costs under section 13-17-202; and (8) as the prevailing party, No-vak was…”
Exotic Coins, Inc. v. Beacom, 699 P.2d 930 (Colo. 1985).
· cites it 3× “§ 18-16-104. The Act exempts from its requirements certain transactions by private collectors and certain purchases made exclusively in interstate commerce.”
Rathke v. MacFarlane, 648 P.2d 648 (Colo. 1982).
· cites it 2× “In addition, section 18-16-107 requires purchasers to provide written records and reports of purchase transactions to local law enforcement agencies on a weekly basis, and section 18-16-104 prohibits the purchase of any valuable article from any person under eighteen years of…”
Bumbal v. Smith, 165 P.3d 844 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 3× “54(d), § 18-16-104, C.R.S.2006, and several other statutes.”
Sweeney v. United Artists Theater Circuit, Inc., 119 P.3d 538 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “We conclude that while the trial court mistakenly referred to § 18-16-104, C.R.S.2004, in awarding costs to defendant, the award was proper pursuant to either § 18-16-105 or § 18-16-107, C.”
Paratransit Risk Retention Grp. Ins. Co. v. Kamins, 160 P.3d 307 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “§ 18-16-104, C.R.S.2006. In addition, § 13-17-202(1)(a) provides: (I) If the plaintiff serves an offer of settlement in writing at any time more than fourteen days before the commencement of the trial that is rejected by the defendant, and the plaintiff recovers a final judgment…”
Chavez v. Parkview Episcopal Med. Ctr., 32 P.3d 609 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).
“The trial court has broad discretion in awarding costs to prevailing parties See § 18-16-104, C.R.98.2000; Cherry Creek School District # 5 v.”
Phillips v. Watkins, 166 P.3d 197 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
“Our conclusion that § 18-16-111 does not mandate an award of costs to a partially successful plaintiff is further supported by the manner in which courts have applied § 18-16-104, the general costs statute for plaintiffs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.