Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-301 (2026)
Robbery
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) A person who knowingly takes anything of value from the person or presence of another by the use of force, threats, or intimidation commits robbery. (2) Robbery is a class 4 felony.
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 427, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-4-301. L. 77: (1) amended, p. 963, § 22, effective July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 107
cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: People v. Bridges, 612 P.2d 1110 (Colo. 1980).
People v. Bridges, 612 P.2d 1110 (Colo. 1980). “8)] and the robbery statute [section 18-4-301, C.R.S.1973 (1976 Supp.; current version in 1978 Repl.”
Smith v. Dist. Court for the Fourth Jud. Dist., State of Colorado, Div. 6, 629 P.2d 1055 (Colo. 1981). “The facts alleged in this case are as follows: The petitioner had pled guilty to robbery, section 18-4-301, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol.”
Yates v. People, 2019 CO 90 (Colo. 2019). “§ 18-4-301(1), C.R.S. (2019). Thus, robbery, by its very nature, involves knowing conduct and grave harm (or the threat of grave harm) to the victim or society (or both).”
People v. Degreat, 2018 CO 83 (Colo. 2018). “2d 331 , 335 (1977) ("We therefore hold that robbery under section 18-4-301 requires no specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the use or benefit of his property.”
People v. James, 117 P.3d 91 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Section 18-4-301(1), C.R.S.2004. *98 In the trial court, there was evidence presented that: (1) defendant participated in the Mdnapping of the victim; (2) defendant hit and taunted the victim before he was robbed of his clothes and wallet; (3) defendant was seated in the back…”
People v. Bartowsheski, 661 P.2d 235 (Colo. 1983). “The judge expressly stated, when the prosecution asked the basis for his dismissal of one potential juror, that he intended to resolve any doubts in favor of the defense.”
People v. Davis, 935 P.2d 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “Defendant next contends that the trial court erred in refusing to find that the application of §§ 18-4-301, 18-6.5-102, and 18-6.5-103 to him, violated his rights to due process and equal protection of the laws.”
People v. Rodriguez, 914 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1996). “Our review of the information charging aggravated robbery reveals that the information tracked the appropriate statutory language, see §§ 18-4-301 to -302, 8 C.R.S. (1978), and reveals no error.”
Bostelman v. People, 162 P.3d 686 (Colo. 2007). “Bostelman was charged with robbery pursuant to section 18-4-301, C.R.S. (1999). . See generally § 19-2-907, C.”
People v. Marquez, 692 P.2d 1089 (Colo. 1984). “Section 18-4-301, 8 C.R.S. (1978), provides that a person commits robbery where they knowingly take "anything of value from the person or presence of another" by the use of force, threats, or intimidation.”
Tacorante v. People, 624 P.2d 1324 (Colo. 1981). “Section 18-4-301, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol.”
People v. Aguilar, 317 P.3d 1255 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012). “"); § 18-4-301(1), C.R.S.2012 ("A person who knowingly takes anything of value from the person or presence of another by the use of force, threats, or intimidation commits robbery.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-301(1) — 52 cases
Yates v. People, 2019 CO 90 (Colo. 2019). “§ 18-4-301(1), C.R.S. (2019). Thus, robbery, by its very nature, involves knowing conduct and grave harm (or the threat of grave harm) to the victim or society (or both).”
People v. Bridges, 612 P.2d 1110 (Colo. 1980). “8)] and the robbery statute [section 18-4-301, C.R.S.1973 (1976 Supp.; current version in 1978 Repl.”
People v. Degreat, 2018 CO 83 (Colo. 2018). “2d 331 , 335 (1977) ("We therefore hold that robbery under section 18-4-301 requires no specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the use or benefit of his property.”
People v. James, 117 P.3d 91 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Section 18-4-301(1), C.R.S.2004. *98 In the trial court, there was evidence presented that: (1) defendant participated in the Mdnapping of the victim; (2) defendant hit and taunted the victim before he was robbed of his clothes and wallet; (3) defendant was seated in the back…”
People v. Davis, 935 P.2d 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “Defendant next contends that the trial court erred in refusing to find that the application of §§ 18-4-301, 18-6.5-102, and 18-6.5-103 to him, violated his rights to due process and equal protection of the laws.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-4-301(2) — 4 cases
People v. Al-Yousif, 206 P.3d 824 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People v. Warner, 801 P.2d 1187 (Colo. 1990).
People v. Dempsey, 624 P.2d 374 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).
People v. Young, 758 P.2d 667 (Colo. 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.