(1) Any person who does any of the following for money or other thing of value commits pandering of a child:
(a) Inducing a child by menacing or criminal intimidation to commit prostitution; or
(b) Knowingly arranging or offering to arrange a situation in which a child may practice prostitution.
(2) Pandering under paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of this section is a class 2 felony. Pandering under paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section is a class 3 felony.
Source: L. 79: Entire part RC&RE, p. 741, § 1, effective May 31.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case:
Peo v. Houser, 2020 COA 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
Peo v. Houser, 2020 COA 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 7× “The division concluded that the conviction violated equal protection principles under the Colorado Constitution because section 18-7-403(1)(a), C.R.S. 2019 (pandering of a child), and section 18-7-405.”
People v. Madden, 111 P.3d 452 (Colo. 2005).
· cites it 4× “S (2004); Pandering of a Child, § 18-7-403, C.R.S (2004); Keeping a Place of Child Prostitution, § 18-7-404, C.”
v. Maloy, 2020 COA 71 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“” § 18-7-403(1)(b). ¶ 26 Pandering under subsection (1)(b) prohibits substantially different conduct than that criminalized as patronizing.”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“1996), as well as all individuals convicted of any offense, of attempt to commit any offense, or of any offense having a factual basis of incest, indecent exposure, any violation related to child prostitution under sections 18-7-403 to -406, 6 C.R.S. (1997), and/or trafficking…”
People v. Poindexter, 338 P.3d 352 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “2012; pandering of a child, which is found in article 7 of article 18 (Offenses Relating to Morals), see § 18-7-403, C.R.S. 2012; or resisting arrest by using physical force against a peace officer, which is found in title 8 of article 18 (Offenses-Governmental Operations), see…”
v. Ross, 2019 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
“2018 (patronizing a prostitute), with § 18-7-403(1), (2), C.R.S. 2018 (pandering of a child), and § 18-7-406(1)(a), C.”
People v. Young, 694 P.2d 841 (Colo. 1985).
· cites it 2× “5 provides: Any person who by word or action, other than conduct specified in section 18-7-403(l)(a), induces a child to engage in an act which is prostitution by a child, as defined in section 18-7-401(6), commits inducement of child prostitution.”
Peo v. Houser, 2020 COA 76 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 7× “The division concluded that the conviction violated equal protection principles under the Colorado Constitution because section 18-7-403(1)(a), C.R.S. 2019 (pandering of a child), and section 18-7-405.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-7-403(1): 1 case
v. Ross, 2019 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
“2018 (patronizing a prostitute), with § 18-7-403(1), (2), C.R.S. 2018 (pandering of a child), and § 18-7-406(1)(a), C.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-7-403(1)(a): 3 cases
Peo v. Houser, 2020 COA 128 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“The division concluded that the conviction violated equal protection principles under the Colorado Constitution because section 18-7-403(1)(a), C.R.S. 2019 (pandering of a child), and section 18-7-405.”
Peo v. Houser, 2020 COA 76 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“The division concluded that the conviction violated equal protection principles under the Colorado Constitution because section 18-7-403(1)(a), C.R.S. 2019 (pandering of a child), and section 18-7-405.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-7-403(1)(b): 2 cases
v. Maloy, 2020 COA 71 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020).
“” § 18-7-403(1)(b). ¶ 26 Pandering under subsection (1)(b) prohibits substantially different conduct than that criminalized as patronizing.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-7-403(l)(a): 1 case
People v. Young, 694 P.2d 841 (Colo. 1985).
“5 provides: Any person who by word or action, other than conduct specified in section 18-7-403(l)(a), induces a child to engage in an act which is prostitution by a child, as defined in section 18-7-401(6), commits inducement of child prostitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.