Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 18
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-107 (2024)

Refusing to aid a peace officer - repeal

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 456, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-8-107. L. 2021: (2) added by revision, (SB 21-271), ch. 462, pp. 3195, 3331, §§ 275, 803.

Editor's note: Subsections (1)(b)(II) and (1)(d)(II) provided for the repeal of subsections (1)(b) and (1)(d), respectively, effective March 1, 2022. (See L. 2021, pp. 3204, 3331.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2002 · leading case: State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991). “273, § 1 (Deering); Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-107 (1986). Some states, like Arizona, have expressly codified a requirement of reasonableness.”
People v. Banks, 9 P.3d 1125 (Colo. 2000). “Laws 716 (emphasis added) (codified as amended at § 18-8-107(5), 6 C.R.S. (1999)). Accordingly, the Assembly amended seetion 18-3-203(2)(c) to add the offense of see-ond degree assault on a peace officer to the list of offenses that "shall" receive the more severe range of…”
Dep't of Pub. Affairs v. Colorado Dep't of Corr., 216 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (D. Colo. 2002). · cites it 5× “The statutory provision cited is clearly inapplicable. Section 18-8-107 criminalizes the “unreasonable] refus[al]” by an individual “upon command” of a peace officer to aid that officer in “effecting or securing an arrest or preventing the commission .”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-8-107(5): 1 case
People v. Banks, 9 P.3d 1125 (Colo. 2000). “Laws 716 (emphasis added) (codified as amended at § 18-8-107(5), 6 C.R.S. (1999)). Accordingly, the Assembly amended seetion 18-3-203(2)(c) to add the offense of see-ond degree assault on a peace officer to the list of offenses that "shall" receive the more severe range of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.