Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-4-129 (2026)

Child support - guidelines - schedule of basic support obligations

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of section 14-10-115, C.R.S., shall apply to all child support obligations, established or modified, as part of any proceeding under this article, whether filed on or subsequent to July 1, 1988.

Source: L. 88: Entire section added, p. 746, § 15, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1989–2019 · leading case: In the Interest of D.R.Y., 885 P.2d 351 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).
In the Interest of D.R.Y., 885 P.2d 351 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, § 19-4-129, C.R.S. (1994 Cum. Supp.), added in 1988, provides that the provisions of § 14-10-115 shall apply to all child support obligations, established or modified as part of any paternity proceeding, whether filed on or subsequent to July 1, 1988.”
S.F.E. ex rel. T.I.E., 981 P.2d 642 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Further, §19-4-129, C.R.S.1998, provides that the provisions of §14-10-115 shall apply to all child support obligations, established or modified, as part of any paternity proceeding that is filed on or subsequent to July 1, 1988.”
In Re the Marriage of Smith, 7 P.3d 1012 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “See §§ 19-4-129 and 19-4-116(6)(k), C.R.S.1999 (child support guidelines apply to child support obligations established or modified in proceedings under the UPA).”
Combs v. Tibbitts, 148 P.3d 430 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Any such deviation shall be accompanied by written or oral findings by the court specifying the reasons for the deviation and the presumed amount under the guideline without a deviation. Section 14-10-115(3)(a).”
M.F. ex rel. M.F. v. L.M., 780 P.2d 69 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “See § 19-4-129, C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.) Accordingly, the order is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the merits of mother’s motion to modify child support.”
5 In the Interest of NJC, 2019 COA 153 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). “2 ¶ 11 The juvenile court judge adopted the magistrate’s decision not to include the deferred compensation, pointing out the magistrate’s reasoning that father could not contribute to the plan, had no control over the funds, and had no guarantee he would ever receive the money.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.