Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-1-101 (2026)

Congressional districts

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 1891: p. 89, § 1. R.S. 08: § 125. L. 13: p. 517, § 1. L. 21: p. 170, § 1. C.L. § 43. CSA: C. 8, § 9. CRS 53: § 63-4-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 28-1-1. L. 64, 1st Ex. Sess.: p. 11, § 1. L. 72: p. 184, § 1. L. 74: (5) to (7) R&RE, p. 407, § 19, effective April 11. L. 92: (1) R&RE and (2), (5), (7), and (8) amended, pp. 593, 603, §§ 2, 3, effective March 24. L. 2003: (1) R&RE and (2), (5)(b), and (8) amended, pp. 1645, 1658, §§ 1, 2, effective May 9. L. 2017: Entire section repealed, (HB 17-1074), ch. 22, p. 68, § 1, effective August 9.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2003 · leading case: Carstens v. Lamm.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Carstens v. Lamm (D. Colo. 1982). · cites it 4× “1973 § 2-1-101 is unconstitutional. The Court is of the view, however, that none of the plans submitted to the Court during the course of this litigation fully comport with the objectives and criteria which we feel should be incorporated in a judicially approved redistricting…”

Beauprez v. Avalos (Colo. 2002). · cites it 2× “On January 25, 2002, the Denver District Court ("the district court") issued an order decreeing that the current congressional districts as set forth in section 2-1-101, 1 C.R.S. (2001), are unconstitutional and that the Secretary of State of Colorado, Donetta Davidson…”

People Ex Rel. Salazar v. Davidson (Colo. 2003). “1, § 2-1-101, 2008 Colo. Sess. Laws 1645 , 1645-58.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.