Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 2
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-4-108 (2026)

Computation of time

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) In computing a period of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included.

(2) If the last day of any period is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period is extended to include the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

(3) If a number of months is to be computed by counting the months from a particular day, the period ends on the same numerical day in the concluding month as the day of the month from which the computation is begun, unless there are not that many days in the concluding month, in which case the period ends on the last day of that month.

Source: L. 73: R&RE, p. 1423, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 135-1-108.

Cross references: For provisions governing publication of legal notices and advertisements and the computation of time therefor, see part 1 of article 70 of title 24; for computation of time under the "Uniform Election Code of 1992", articles 1 to 13 of title 1, see § 1-1-106.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: People v. Fransua, 2016 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Fransua, 2016 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 25× “4 Section 135-1-108 was codified at section 2-4-108 in the 1973 codification of the Colorado Revised Statutes and section 16-11-206 was codified at section 18-1.”
v. People, 2019 CO 96 (Colo. 2019). · cites it 8× “Whether section 2-4-108(1), C.R.S. (2016), which provides that, “in computing periods of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included,” applies to the calculation of presentence- confinement credit.”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Delinda EVANS, & Kenneth Evans, 504 P.3d 988 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “" See also § 2-4-108(2), C.R.S. 2021 (same definition applies to construction of statutes); C.”
98, People v. West, 2019 COA 131 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 2-4-108(2), C.R.S. 2018; People v. Hampton, 696 P.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of the Cnty. of Teller v. City of Woodland Park, 333 P.3d 55 (Colo. 2014). · cites it 5× “The statutory provision governing the computation of time is section 2-4-108, C.R.S. (2013). It states in pertinent part: (1) In computing a period of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included.”
Shaball v. State Comp. Ins. Auth., 799 P.2d 399 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “See § 2-4-108, C.R.S. (1980 Repl.Vol. IB). III.”
Rowe v. Tucker, 560 P.2d 843 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 7× “Tucker v. Claimants in re Death of Gonzales, Colo.”
Golden Aluminum Co. v. Weld Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 867 P.2d 190 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “In computing this period, because nothing in § 39-10-114(l)(a)(I)(A) indicates otherwise, the day from which the two-year period begins to run is excluded and the last day of the period so computed is included.”
People v. Bielecki, 588 P.2d 377 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “Section 2-4-108(2), C.R.S.1973. Defendant also argues that he was entitled to an instruction on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor theft (§ 18-4-401(3), C.”
People v. Hampton, 696 P.2d 765 (Colo. 1985). · cites it 2× “[8] § 2-4-108, 1B C.R.S. (1980), establishes the following rules for the computation of time: (1) In computing a period of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included.”
Garcia v. Medved Chevrolet, Inc., 240 P.3d 371 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 3× “Our conclusion is not altered by section 2-4-108(2), C.R.S.2009, a statute which neither party has cited to us.”
Schumm v. Nelson, 659 P.2d 1389 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 3× “See section 2-4-108(1), C.R.S.1973 which provides that in computing a statutory period of days, the first day is excluded, and the last day included.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-4-108(1) — 10 cases
People v. Fransua, 2016 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016). “4 Section 135-1-108 was codified at section 2-4-108 in the 1973 codification of the Colorado Revised Statutes and section 16-11-206 was codified at section 18-1.”
v. People, 2019 CO 96 (Colo. 2019). “Whether section 2-4-108(1), C.R.S. (2016), which provides that, “in computing periods of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included,” applies to the calculation of presentence- confinement credit.”
Schumm v. Nelson, 659 P.2d 1389 (Colo. 1983). “See section 2-4-108(1), C.R.S.1973 which provides that in computing a statutory period of days, the first day is excluded, and the last day included.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of the Cnty. of Teller v. City of Woodland Park, 333 P.3d 55 (Colo. 2014). “The statutory provision governing the computation of time is section 2-4-108, C.R.S. (2013). It states in pertinent part: (1) In computing a period of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included.”
Golden Aluminum Co. v. Weld Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 867 P.2d 190 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “In computing this period, because nothing in § 39-10-114(l)(a)(I)(A) indicates otherwise, the day from which the two-year period begins to run is excluded and the last day of the period so computed is included.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-4-108(2) — 10 cases
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Delinda EVANS, & Kenneth Evans, 504 P.3d 988 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “" See also § 2-4-108(2), C.R.S. 2021 (same definition applies to construction of statutes); C.”
98, People v. West, 2019 COA 131 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 2-4-108(2), C.R.S. 2018; People v. Hampton, 696 P.”
v. People, 2019 CO 96 (Colo. 2019). “Whether section 2-4-108(1), C.R.S. (2016), which provides that, “in computing periods of days, the first day is excluded and the last day is included,” applies to the calculation of presentence- confinement credit.”
Rowe v. Tucker, 560 P.2d 843 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). “Tucker v. Claimants in re Death of Gonzales, Colo.”
People v. Bielecki, 588 P.2d 377 (Colo. Ct. App. 1978). “Section 2-4-108(2), C.R.S.1973. Defendant also argues that he was entitled to an instruction on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor theft (§ 18-4-401(3), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 2-4-108(3) — 1 case
Peo v. Montoya (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.