Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 24
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-109-104 (2024)

Entitlement to costs

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 81: Entire article added, p. 1278, § 1, effective January 1, 1982. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 874, § 4, effective June 6. L. 2017: Entire section repealed, (HB 17-1051), ch. 99, p. 354, § 77, effective August 9.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2004 · leading case: Hawes v. Colorado Div. of Ins., 65 P.3d 1008 (Colo. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hawes v. Colorado Div. of Ins., 65 P.3d 1008 (Colo. 2003). · cites it 2× “(2002) (in the state personnel system, an action brought frivolously, in bad faith, maliciously, or as a means of harassment or otherwise groundless, shall result in attorneys' fees and costs against offending party and determination is to be made by the agency); § 24-109-104,…”
Wilson v. Los Angeles Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth., 1 P.3d 63 (Cal. 2000). “§ 103D-701, subd. (g) [“In addition to any other relief, when a protest is sustained and the protestor should have been awarded the contract under the solicitation but is not, then the protestor shall be entitled to the actual costs reasonably incurred in connection with the…”
Miami-dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. J. Ruiz Sch. Bus Serv., Inc., 874 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). “(g) ["In addition to any other relief, when a protest is sustained and the protestor should have been awarded the contract under the solicitation but is not, then the protestor shall be entitled to the actual costs reasonably incurred in connection with the solicitation,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.