Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 25
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-15-207 (2024)

Judicial review

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The award, denial, revocation, or suspension of a certificate of designation by the board of county commissioners or by the governing body of the municipality shall be subject to judicial review in the district court for the judicial district in which the hazardous waste disposal site is located or is proposed to be located. Any request for such judicial review must be made within thirty days of such award, denial, revocation, or suspension. If the court finds no error, it shall affirm the action. If the court finds that the action is arbitrary and capricious, not in accord with the procedures or procedural limitations of this part 2, unsupported by substantial evidence when the record is considered as a whole, or otherwise contrary to law, then the court shall hold unlawful and set aside the action and remand the case to the board of county commissioners or to the governing body of the municipality for further proceedings as may be appropriate.

(2) In the case of any action or decision of the council or department pursuant to section 25-15-206, judicial review shall be in the district court for the judicial district within which the hazardous waste disposal site is or may be located and shall be in accordance with section 24-4- 106, C.R.S.

Source: L. 81: Entire article R&RE, p. 1349, § 1, effective July 1. L. 83: Entire section amended, p. 1093, § 11, effective June 3. L. 2005: (2) amended, p. 285, § 29, effective August 8.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Whelden v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 782 P.2d 853 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Whelden v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 782 P.2d 853 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 7× “Apply *856 ing the Act as amended in 1983, see § 25-15-200.1, et seq., C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
U.S. Pollution Control, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 714 P.2d 511 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “USPCI sought judicial review pursuant to § 25-15-207, C.R.S. (1984 Cum.Supp.). The district court held that the notice given for the public hearing was defective.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Colorado Dep't of Pub. Health & Env't, 178 P.3d 1221 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “2007 (county may revoke or suspend a CD); see also § 25-15-207(1), C.R.S. 2007 (county may seek judicial review for the award, denial, revocation, or suspension of the CD).”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-15-207(1): 2 cases
Whelden v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 782 P.2d 853 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “Apply *856 ing the Act as amended in 1983, see § 25-15-200.1, et seq., C.R.S. (1988 Cum. Supp.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Colorado Dep't of Pub. Health & Env't, 178 P.3d 1221 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “2007 (county may revoke or suspend a CD); see also § 25-15-207(1), C.R.S. 2007 (county may seek judicial review for the award, denial, revocation, or suspension of the CD).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.