Neither the fact that a person
has been rated incompetent by the veterans administration nor the fact that a guardian has been
appointed for a person under the provisions of this part 2 shall be construed as a legal
adjudication of insanity or mental incompetency, unless such person also is or has been
adjudicated insane or mentally incompetent by a state court of competent jurisdiction.
Source: L. 45: p. 658, § 18. CSA: C. 150, § 55 (18). CRS 53: § 143-3-18. C.R.S. 1963:
§ 144-3-18.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 2005–2005 · leading case:
In re Est. of Romero, 126 P.3d 228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
In re Est. of Romero, 126 P.3d 228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “Moreover, § 28-5-219, C.R.S.2004, provides that neither the fact that a person has been rated incompetent by the VA nor the fact that a guardian has been appointed for the person shall be construed as a legal adjudication of insanity or mental ineompetency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.