Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 29-1-801 (2024)

Legislative declaration

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The general assembly hereby finds and determines that statewide standards governing accountability for land development charges imposed by local governments to finance capital facilities and services are necessary and desirable to ensure reasonable certainty, stability, and fairness in the use to which moneys generated by such charges are put and to promote public confidence in local government finance. The general assembly therefore declares that this part 8 is a matter of statewide concern.

Source: L. 90: Entire part added, p. 1438, § 1, effective January 1, 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1996–2001 · leading case: Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc., 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc., 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1996). · cites it 3× “Land Development Charges Statute The Counties contend that “[a]ny doubt as to whether the authority to impose such fees exists is foreclosed by the Land Development Charges statutes,” sections 29-1-801 to -804, 12A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.”
Cnty. Com'rs of Douglas v. Bainbridge, 929 P.2d 691 (Colo. 1997). · cites it 3× “Land Development Charges Statute The Counties contend that "[a]ny doubt as to whether the authority to impose such fees exists is foreclosed by the Land Development Charges statutes," sections 29-1-801 to -804, 12A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.”
Wilber v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 42 P.3d 49 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “As relevant here, § 29-1-801(1)(a), C.R.S. 2000, places a 5.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 29-1-801(1)(a): 1 case
Wilber v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 42 P.3d 49 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001). “As relevant here, § 29-1-801(1)(a), C.R.S. 2000, places a 5.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.