Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 35
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 35-80-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act".

Source: L. 94: Entire article added, p. 1299, § 8, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Kourlis v. Dist. Court, El Paso Cnty., 930 P.2d 1329 (Colo. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kourlis v. Dist. Court, El Paso Cnty., 930 P.2d 1329 (Colo. 1997). · cites it 7× “(1995), of the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act (the Act), §§ 35-80-101 to -117, 14 C.R.S. (1995). This court issued a rule to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted.”
Salazar v. Kubic, 2015 COA 148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “Kubic breeds mice and rats to sell as a food source for other animals, Raising novel arguments, she challenges the applicability of the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act (PACFA), §§ 35-80-101 to -117, C.R.S. 2015, to her business.”
Joseph v. Equity Edge, LLC, 192 P.3d 573 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). “However, we agree with the Commissioner that, like the court's limited discretion under the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act, sections 35-80-101 to -117, C.R.S.2007, reviewed in Kourlis v.”
Comm'r of Agric. v. Waldrop (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “¶3 Waldrop owned and operated Douglas County Canine Rescue (DCCR), a pet animal rescue facility licensed under the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act (PACFA), §§ 35-80-101 to -117, C.R.S. 2025. Waldrop made false and fraudulent statements in her application to renew her pet…”
Salazar, Comm'r of Agric. v. Kubic, 2015 COA 148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “Raising novel arguments, she challenges the applicability of the Pet Animal Care and Facilities Act (PACFA), §§ 35-80-101 to -117, C.R.S. 2015, to her business.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.