Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 36
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 36-2-101 (2024)

Right of citizens claiming

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Conceding to the United States the primary and paramount right to dispose of the soil of this state, according to the laws existing or to be enacted by congress, and full and complete exemption from every form of taxation of their property, it is hereby declared that as between all the good citizens residing in this state, and as between them, or any of them, and others, having or claiming, or pretending to have or claim, any right to occupy, possess, and enjoy any portion of the public domain situate within the boundaries of this state, and as between each and every one of them, and all other persons, associations, corporations, and powers except the government of the United States, the right as the same may exist under the local laws, to occupy, possess, and enjoy any tract or portion thereof, shall be respected in law in all the courts and tribunals of this state.

Source: R.S. p. 531, § 1. G.L. § 2124. G.S. § 2674. R.S. 08: § 5120. C.L. § 1103. CSA: C. 134, § 1. CRS 53: § 112-1-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 112-1-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2002 · leading case: Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Park Cnty. Sportsmen's Ranch, LLP, 45 P.3d 693 (Colo. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Park Cnty. Sportsmen's Ranch, LLP, 45 P.3d 693 (Colo. 2002). · cites it 2× “[21] For example, Colorado defined "any right to occupy, possess and enjoy any portion of the public domain" as "a chattel real possessing the legal character of real estate.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. Vail Assocs., Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo. 2001). “See § 36-2-101, 10 C.R.S. (2000). . The Board of Assessment Appeals argues that section 30-11-105.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.