Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-44-107 (2024)

Adjournments and report

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The proceedings may be adjourned by the commission from time to time as may be necessary, but the survey and location of the corners and boundaries must be complete and the report thereof filed with the clerk of the court at least ten days before the first day of the term next following that of its appointment, unless the court appointing it makes an order for an earlier report.

Source: L. 07: p. 288, § 7. Code 08: § 303. Code 21: § 304. Code 35: § 304. CRS 53: § 118-11-7. C.R.S. 1963: § 118-11-7.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2010 · leading case: Anderson v. Vail Corp., 251 P.3d 1125 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. Vail Corp., 251 P.3d 1125 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the ski resort based on its finding that "after thoroughly reviewing the number, location and orientation of nine (9) boundary signs, the Court finds them to be 'in a fashion readily visible to skiers under conditions of…”
Ciocian v. Vail Corp., 251 P.3d 1130 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The ski resort's argument that under seetion 33-44-109(5), the skiers had a duty to "locate and ascertain" its boundary signs is also misplaced because this duty is only placed upon skiers in "decreased visibility" and only in the event the ski resort boundary lines are marked…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 38-44-107(6): 1 case
Anderson v. Vail Corp., 251 P.3d 1125 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). “The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the ski resort based on its finding that "after thoroughly reviewing the number, location and orientation of nine (9) boundary signs, the Court finds them to be 'in a fashion readily visible to skiers under conditions of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.