(1) (a) For the purposes of this section, "official sign" means a sign identifying a parking space for electric motor vehicle charging that cites this section or the equivalent local ordinance and that clearly displays the penalties for violating this section or the equivalent local ordinance.
(b) The owner of public or private property may install official signs that identify a parking space as a dedicated charging station. The installation operates as a waiver of any objection the owner may assert concerning enforcement of this section by a peace officer. A peace officer may enforce this section on private property.
(2) (a) A person shall not park a motor vehicle within a parking space designated for charging a plug-in electric motor vehicle unless the motor vehicle is a plug-in electric motor vehicle.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a person shall not park a plug-in electric motor vehicle in a parking space with a dedicated charging connector for the parking space unless the person is parked in the charging station for the purpose of charging the plug-in electric motor vehicle.
(c) A plug-in electric motor vehicle is rebuttably presumed to not be charging if the motor vehicle is:
(I) Parked in a charging station parking space with a dedicated charging connector for the space; and
(II) Not continuously and electrically connected to the charger for longer than thirty minutes.
(3) (a) A person may park a plug-in electric motor vehicle at a charging station after the motor vehicle is fully charged in a parking lot:
(I) That serves a lodging business if the person is a client of the lodging business and has parked the plug-in electric motor vehicle in the lot to charge overnight;
(II) That serves an airport if the person is a client of the airport and has parked the plug- in electric motor vehicle in the lot to charge when traveling; or
(III) Between the hours of 11 p.m. and 5 a.m.
(b) The exception in subsection (3)(a) of this section is an affirmative defense to a violation of subsection (2) of this section.
(4) A person who violates this section commits a class B traffic infraction.
Source: L. 2019: Entire section added, (HB 19-1298), ch. 384, p. 3439, § 3, effective August 2.
PART 13
ALCOHOL AND DRUG OFFENSES
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
11
cases, 1987–1999 · leading case:
People v. Fahselt, 807 P.2d 586 (Colo. 1991).
People v. Fahselt, 807 P.2d 586 (Colo. 1991).
· cites it 4× “The respondent pleaded guilty to failure to maintain compulsory insurance, contrary to section 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984), a class 1 traffic offense.”
Barnes v. Whitt, 852 P.2d 1322 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 8× “motor vehicle who operates the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state or who knowingly permits the operation of the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state shall have in full force and effect a complying policy under the terms of this part 7 covering the…”
People v. Wright, 742 P.2d 316 (Colo. 1987).
· cites it 4× “), 2 and the state misdemeanor traffic offense of driving without compulsory insurance in violation of section 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984), 3 and was ordered to appear in Jefferson County Court to answer these charges.”
People v. Thomas, 839 P.2d 1174 (Colo. 1992).
“The statements as to the drugs and the written confession, however, were properly suppressed by the district court.”
People v. Sosbe, 789 P.2d 1113 (Colo. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Thereafter, the defendant was charged by information with possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, 1 driving while license denied, suspended, or revoked, 2 and violation of the mandatory motor vehicle insurance coverage provisions of section 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984 &…”
Hellman v. Rhodes, 741 P.2d 1258 (Colo. 1987).
· cites it 2× “(1984), and violating the compulsory insurance requirement, § 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984). 2 Sentencing was scheduled for December 19, 1985, but Heilman failed to appear and a warrant was issued for his arrest.”
Bath v. Colorado Dep't of Revenue, 758 P.2d 1381 (Colo. 1988).
“(1984); driving without proof of insurance, § 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984); and driving with excessive alcohol content, § 42-4-1202(1.”
Gonsoir v. People, 793 P.2d 1165 (Colo. 1990).
· cites it 2× “The record reveals that the People had been granted two prior continuances because of the unavailability of this witness. The record also establishes that after jury selection but prior to the commencement of the prosecutor's opening statement Gonsoir’s attorney requested…”
In re Kearns, 991 P.2d 824 (Colo. 1999).
“In addition to vehicular assault and DUI, Fahselt was convicted of failure to maintain compulsory insurance, see § 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984), and reckless driving, see § 42-4-1203(1), 17 C.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-4-1213(1): 1 case
Barnes v. Whitt, 852 P.2d 1322 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
“motor vehicle who operates the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state or who knowingly permits the operation of the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state shall have in full force and effect a complying policy under the terms of this part 7 covering the…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-4-1213(3): 2 cases
Gonsoir v. People, 793 P.2d 1165 (Colo. 1990).
“The record reveals that the People had been granted two prior continuances because of the unavailability of this witness. The record also establishes that after jury selection but prior to the commencement of the prosecutor's opening statement Gonsoir’s attorney requested…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-4-1213(4): 2 cases
Barnes v. Whitt, 852 P.2d 1322 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
“motor vehicle who operates the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state or who knowingly permits the operation of the motor vehicle on the public highways of this state shall have in full force and effect a complying policy under the terms of this part 7 covering the…”
Hellman v. Rhodes, 741 P.2d 1258 (Colo. 1987).
“(1984), and violating the compulsory insurance requirement, § 42-4-1213, 17 C.R.S. (1984). 2 Sentencing was scheduled for December 19, 1985, but Heilman failed to appear and a warrant was issued for his arrest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.