(1) The general assembly hereby finds, determines, and declares that:
(a) The use of the telephone and telefacsimile ("fax") to market goods and services is widespread;
(b) Many citizens of this state view telemarketing as an invasion of privacy;
(c) Individuals' privacy rights and commercial freedom of speech should be balanced in a way that accommodates both the privacy of individuals and legitimate telemarketing practices;
(d) Although charitable and political organizations are exempt from the provisions of this part 9 because of considerations of freedom of speech, the general assembly encourages such organizations to voluntarily comply with this part 9 when possible; and
(e) It is in the public interest to establish a mechanism under which the individual citizens of this state can decide whether or not to receive telephone solicitations by phone or fax.
Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 1454, § 1, effective August 8.
Notes of Decisions
Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Sys. of S. Colorado, 172 P.3d 888 (Colo. 2007).
· cites it 10× “§ 6-1-902(1)(c), C.R.S. (2007). No person or entity shall make or cause to be made any telephone solicitation to the telephone of any residential subscriber or wireless telephone service subscriber in this state who has added his or her telephone number and zip code to the…”
Martinez v. Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 2017 COA 37, 434 P.3d 689.
· cites it 2× “”); § 6-1-902(1)(c), C.R.S. 2016 (“Individuals’ privacy rights and commercial freedom of speech should be balanced in a way that accommodates both the privacy of individuals and legitimate telemarketing practices[.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-902(1)(c): 2 cases
Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Sys. of S. Colorado, 172 P.3d 888 (Colo. 2007).
“§ 6-1-902(1)(c), C.R.S. (2007). No person or entity shall make or cause to be made any telephone solicitation to the telephone of any residential subscriber or wireless telephone service subscriber in this state who has added his or her telephone number and zip code to the…”
Martinez v. Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 2017 COA 37, 434 P.3d 689.
“”); § 6-1-902(1)(c), C.R.S. 2016 (“Individuals’ privacy rights and commercial freedom of speech should be balanced in a way that accommodates both the privacy of individuals and legitimate telemarketing practices[.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-902(1)(e): 1 case
Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Sys. of S. Colorado, 172 P.3d 888 (Colo. 2007).
“§ 6-1-902(1)(c), C.R.S. (2007). No person or entity shall make or cause to be made any telephone solicitation to the telephone of any residential subscriber or wireless telephone service subscriber in this state who has added his or her telephone number and zip code to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.