If any provision of this part 9 or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications of this part 9 which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,
and to this end the provisions of this part 9 are declared to be severable.
Source: L. 2001: Entire part added, p. 1460, § 1, effective August 8.
PART 10
RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF LOAN INFORMATION - SOLICITATIONS
Notes of Decisions
Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Sys. of S. Colorado, 172 P.3d 888 (Colo. 2007).
· cites it 2× “See § 6-1-908(9). 5 Nothing in the provision establishing and prescribing the operation of the no-call list, see § 6-1-905; the proscription against soliciting residential subscribers on the list, see § 6-1-904; or the definition of "residential subscriber" itself, see §…”
U.S. Fax Law Ctr., Inc. v. Myron Corp., 159 P.3d 745 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “" Section 6-1-113(1), establishes that actions under the CCPA are available to any person who: (a) Is an actual or potential consumer of the defendant's goods, services, or property and is injured as a result of such deceptive trade practice, or is a residential sub-seriber, as…”
Holcomb v. Steven D. Smith, Inc., 170 P.3d 815 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
“" § 6-1-908(9), C©.R.8.2006. Under the plain language of the Colorado No-Call List Act, if a person subscribes to a residential telephone service and has added that telephone number to the Colorado no-call list, that telephone number is protected *817 from receiving telephone…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-908(10): 1 case
U.S. Fax Law Ctr., Inc. v. Myron Corp., 159 P.3d 745 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
“" Section 6-1-113(1), establishes that actions under the CCPA are available to any person who: (a) Is an actual or potential consumer of the defendant's goods, services, or property and is injured as a result of such deceptive trade practice, or is a residential sub-seriber, as…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-908(9): 2 cases
Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Sys. of S. Colorado, 172 P.3d 888 (Colo. 2007).
“See § 6-1-908(9). 5 Nothing in the provision establishing and prescribing the operation of the no-call list, see § 6-1-905; the proscription against soliciting residential subscribers on the list, see § 6-1-904; or the definition of "residential subscriber" itself, see §…”
Holcomb v. Steven D. Smith, Inc., 170 P.3d 815 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
“" § 6-1-908(9), C©.R.8.2006. Under the plain language of the Colorado No-Call List Act, if a person subscribes to a residential telephone service and has added that telephone number to the Colorado no-call list, that telephone number is protected *817 from receiving telephone…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.