Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 6
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-4-108 (2026)

Facilitating or aiding and abetting

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) It is unlawful to facilitate or aid and abet another person in violating this article 4.

(2) Each separate instance of facilitating or aiding and abetting another person in violating this article 4 is a separate violation of this article 4.

Source: L. 2023: Entire article R&RE, (HB 23-1192), ch. 427, p. 2512, § 2, effective June 7; (5) repealed, (HB 23-1301), ch. 303, p. 1816, § 4, effective August 7. Editor's note: Subsection (5) was repealed in HB 23-1301. Those amendments were superseded by the repeal of subsection (5) in HB 23-1192.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2012 · leading case: Stifflear v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 931 P.2d 471 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stifflear v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 931 P.2d 471 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 7× “Section 6-4-108 of the 1957 Act renders the person, corporation, or association engaging in unlawful conduct liable “to any person transacting or doing business in this state for any damages he may sustain by reason of the doing of anything declared unlawful in this article.”
Amos v. Aspen Alps 123, LLC, 280 P.3d 1256 (Colo. 2012). · cites it 2× “§ 6-4-108, C.R.S. (2011). 27 There are no cases in Colorado interpreting section 64-106.”
Dill v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Lincoln Cnty., 928 P.2d 809 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “In their briefs on appeal, plaintiffs imply that Resolution 294 is intended to be used to prohibit the siting of any other landfill for disposal of non-county waste.”
Winther v. Dec Int'l, Inc., 625 F. Supp. 100 (D. Colo. 1985). · cites it 2× “The civil damages provision, the counterpart of § 4 of the Clayton Act, provides that “Any person, corporation, copartnership, trustee, or association shall also be liable to any person transacting or doing business in this state for any damages he may sustain by reason of the…”
City of Colorado Springs v. Mountain View Elec. Ass'n, 925 P.2d 1378 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “Indeed, while the Colorado Antitrust Act of 1992 is inapplicable to this litigation, it is worthy of note that § 6-4-108(4) of the new legislation expressly provides that persons, activities, or conduct immune from federal antitrust liability are likewise immune under the…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-4-108(4) — 2 cases
Dill v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Lincoln Cnty., 928 P.2d 809 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “In their briefs on appeal, plaintiffs imply that Resolution 294 is intended to be used to prohibit the siting of any other landfill for disposal of non-county waste.”
City of Colorado Springs v. Mountain View Elec. Ass'n, 925 P.2d 1378 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “Indeed, while the Colorado Antitrust Act of 1992 is inapplicable to this litigation, it is worthy of note that § 6-4-108(4) of the new legislation expressly provides that persons, activities, or conduct immune from federal antitrust liability are likewise immune under the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.