Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 8
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-41-201 (2024)

Not applicable to common carriers

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of articles 40 to 47 of this title shall not apply to common carriers by railroad but shall apply to all other employers as defined in said articles engaged in intrastate or interstate commerce, or both, except those employers, other than the Colorado division of civil air patrol, for whom a rule of liability is established by the laws of the United States.

Source: L. 90: Entire article R&RE, p. 477, § 1, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 8-41-107 as it existed prior to 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–2000 · leading case: Hilton v. South Carolina Pub. Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197 (1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hilton v. South Carolina Pub. Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197 (1991). · cites it 2× “, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-41-201 (Supp. *203 1990); D.”
Esser v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 8 P.3d 1218 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). “The question first presented is whether § 8-41-201(2)(a)'s requirement for "testimony" must be taken to refer only to live testimony or whether that requirement may be satisfied by some other form of evidence.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-41-201(2)(a): 1 case
Esser v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 8 P.3d 1218 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). “The question first presented is whether § 8-41-201(2)(a)'s requirement for "testimony" must be taken to refer only to live testimony or whether that requirement may be satisfied by some other form of evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.