Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 8
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-47-104 (2024)

Orders and awards - technical objections

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Substantial compliance with the requirements of articles 40 to 47 of this title shall be sufficient to give effect to the orders or awards of the director or industrial claim appeals office, and they shall not be declared inoperative, illegal, or void for any omission of a technical nature in respect thereto.

Source: L. 90: Entire article R&RE, p. 552, § 1, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 8-46-106 as it existed prior to 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: Colorow Health Care, LLC v. Fischer, 2018 CO 52, 420 P.3d 259.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Colorow Health Care, LLC v. Fischer, 2018 CO 52, 420 P.3d 259. · cites it 4× “, § 8-47-104, C.R.S. (2017) (substantial compliance); § 10-3-302, C.”
Hargett v. Dir., Div. of Labor, 854 P.2d 1316 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “3B) (subsequently amended and recodified at § 8-47-104, C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.)). In addition, Colo.”
In re Interrogatories on Senate Bill 21-247 Submitted by the Colorado Gen. Assembly, 2021 CO 37. · cites it 2× “(2020) (providing general rules for construction of statutes). Similarly, the General Assembly has provided in some instances that a “substantial compliance” standard should be applied to certain statutory claims.”
In re Interrogatories on Senate Bill 21-247 Submitted by the Colorado Gen. Assembly, 488 P.3d 1008 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 2× “( 2020 ) ; § 8-47-104, C.R.S. ( 2020 ) ; § 15-2.5-304, C.”
Fischer v. Colorow Health Care, LLC, 2016 COA 130, 421 P.3d 1176. · cites it 2× “, § 8-47-104, C.R.S. 2015 (“Substantial compliance with the requirements of articles 40 to 47 of this title shall be sufficient .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.