Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-12 (2025)
Typewriting and printing. Legal force
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All typewriting or printing executed or done on public records, and in any instrument, and for any other purpose, shall have the same legal force, meaning and effect as writing, and “writing” shall be held to include typewriting or printing; provided this section shall not be so construed as in any manner to affect or change the law regarding signatures.
(1949 Rev., S. 1641.)
Cited. 206 C. 449.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: Therrien v. Safeguard Mfg. Co., 429 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1980).
Therrien v. Safeguard Mfg. Co., 429 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1980). “The claim of breach of an implied contract could be read to allege failure to perform duties imposed either by a contract implied in fact or a contract implied in law, also often called a quasi-contract.”
Ercole v. Cuomo, 649 A.2d 266 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994). “1987) § 1-12 (“[a] contract implied in law is not a contract at all but an obligation imposed by law to do justice even though it is clear that no promise was ever made or intended”); 17A Am.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.