Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 01 — PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION · Chapter 3 — Public Records: General Provisions
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-15 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 14, Sec. 1-212.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 112 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: King by & Through Small v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 809 S.E.2d 847 (N.C. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
King by & Through Small v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 809 S.E.2d 847 (N.C. 2018). · cites it 18× “C.G.S. § 1-15, describing the generally applicable three-year limitations period for professional negligence actions, states that “[c]ivil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this Chapter, after the cause of action has accrued, except where in special…”
Bd. of Educ. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 545 A.2d 1064 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 8× “The complaint alleged that the board and the superintendent had violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); General Statutes §§ 1-15, l-8a, 1-19 through l-19b, 1-21, l-21a and l-21c through l-21k; by refusing to release the performance evaluation of the superintendent.”
Wilder v. Amatex Corp., 336 S.E.2d 66 (N.C. 1985). · cites it 9× “C.G.S. § 1-15(b) nor its successor N.C.G.”
Gifford v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 631 A.2d 252 (Conn. 1993). · cites it 10× “The commission concluded in its final decision on September 12,1990, that, during the pendency of a criminal prosecution, an arrest report must be disclosed upon request to the public pursuant to General Statutes §§ 1-15 8 and 1-19 (a) of the act.”
City of New Haven v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 535 A.2d 1297 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 5× “4 Barnes rejected all of the city’s arguments and in a proposed written decision he found that the city had violated General Statutes §§ 1-15 5 and 1-19 (a) by refusing to dis *771 close the invoices.”
Dom. Violence Servs. of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 688 A.2d 314 (Conn. 1997). · cites it 10× “shall be public records and every person shall have the right to inspect such records promptly during regular office or business hours or to receive a copy of such records in accordance with the provisions of section 1-15.”
Perkins v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 635 A.2d 783 (Conn. 1993). · cites it 5× “) The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in its entirety is found in General Statutes §§ 1-15, l-18a, 1-19 through l-19c, l-20a through l-21a, and l-21c through l-21k.”
Lieberman v. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 579 A.2d 505 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 4× “5 Such destruction, in the board’s view, does not conflict with interests protected by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), General Statutes §§ 1-15, l-18a, 1-19 through l-19b, 1-21, l-21a and l-21c through l-21k.”
Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc., 472 S.E.2d 778 (N.C. 1996). · cites it 5× “C.G.S. § 1-15(c). On 27 June 1994 the *780 trial court entered an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint, ruling that the action was time-barred.”
Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corp., Keene Corp., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 736 F.2d 946 (4th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 1-15(b) or because of inadequate product identifica *952 tion by the plaintiff during the discovery period.”
Forsyth Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 444 S.E.2d 423 (N.C. 1994). · cites it 4× “Section 1-15(b) provided as follows: Except where otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action, other than one for wrongful death or one for malpractice arising out of the performance of or failure to perform professional services, having as an essential element bodily…”
Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A., 528 S.E.2d 568 (N.C. 2000). · cites it 4× “C.G.S. § 1-15(c). After a hearing in January 1998, Judge Orlando Hudson granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings by order entered 9 February 1998, stating specifically that "the Court holds that the complaint filed on June 3, 1997 does not extend the statute of…”
Show all 112 citing cases →
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-15(a): 5 cases
King by & Through Small v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 809 S.E.2d 847 (N.C. 2018). “C.G.S. § 1-15, describing the generally applicable three-year limitations period for professional negligence actions, states that “[c]ivil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this Chapter, after the cause of action has accrued, except where in special…”
McCutchen v. McCutchen, 612 S.E.2d 162 (N.C. Ct. App. 2005).
Williams v. Gen. Motors Corp., 393 F. Supp. 387 (M.D.N.C. 1975).
Mauck v. Cherry Oil Co., Inc., 2022 NCBC 21 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2022).
Members of N.C. State Univ.'s 1983 Ncaa Men's Basketball Nat'l Championship Team v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, 2025 NCBC 42 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2025).
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-15(b): 12 cases
Wilder v. Amatex Corp., 336 S.E.2d 66 (N.C. 1985). “C.G.S. § 1-15(b) nor its successor N.C.G.”
Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corp., Keene Corp., Pittsburgh Corning Corp., H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 736 F.2d 946 (4th Cir. 1984). “C.G.S. § 1-15(b) or because of inadequate product identifica *952 tion by the plaintiff during the discovery period.”
Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc., 802 S.E.2d 888 (N.C. 2017).
Forsyth Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 444 S.E.2d 423 (N.C. 1994). “Section 1-15(b) provided as follows: Except where otherwise provided by statute, a cause of action, other than one for wrongful death or one for malpractice arising out of the performance of or failure to perform professional services, having as an essential element bodily…”
King by & Through Small v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 809 S.E.2d 847 (N.C. 2018). “C.G.S. § 1-15, describing the generally applicable three-year limitations period for professional negligence actions, states that “[c]ivil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this Chapter, after the cause of action has accrued, except where in special…”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-15(c): 33 cases
King by & Through Small v. Albemarle Hosp. Auth., 809 S.E.2d 847 (N.C. 2018). “C.G.S. § 1-15, describing the generally applicable three-year limitations period for professional negligence actions, states that “[c]ivil actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this Chapter, after the cause of action has accrued, except where in special…”
Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc., 472 S.E.2d 778 (N.C. 1996). “C.G.S. § 1-15(c). On 27 June 1994 the *780 trial court entered an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint, ruling that the action was time-barred.”
Brisson v. Kathy A. Santoriello, M.D., P.A., 528 S.E.2d 568 (N.C. 2000). “C.G.S. § 1-15(c). After a hearing in January 1998, Judge Orlando Hudson granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings by order entered 9 February 1998, stating specifically that "the Court holds that the complaint filed on June 3, 1997 does not extend the statute of…”
Head v. Gould Killian Cpa Grp., P.A., 812 S.E.2d 831 (N.C. 2018).
Orr v. Calvert, 713 S.E.2d 39 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.