Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-28 (2025)
Permissible forms of acknowledgment
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any instrument may be acknowledged in the manner and form now provided by other laws of this state, or as provided by this chapter.
(1961, P.A. 65, S. 1.)
Cited. 176 C. 17.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2021 · leading case: State v. Grant, 404 A.2d 873 (Conn. 1978).
State v. Grant, 404 A.2d 873 (Conn. 1978). “The state asserts that responsibility is sufficiently focused on the state's attorney by virtue of his acknowledgement on the application form. Such an assertion misconstrues the vital distinction between an oath and an acknowledgement.”
Rescia Ch. 7 Tr. v. Freedom Mortg. Corp., No. 20-03041 (Bankr. D. Conn. Sept. 30, 2021). “See, Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 1-28 – 1-41; 1-57 – 1-65z.”
Shortt v. New Milford Police Dep't, 547 A.2d 107 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988). “” We note that the “affidavit” attached to the defendant’s motion to dismiss was not properly executed under oath. Rather, it was merely “acknowledged [by the signer] to be his free act and deed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.