Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-2 (2026)
Officers. Secretaries. Agents. Employees. “Secretary to the State Board of Education” deemed to mean “Commissioner of Education”
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Governor shall select one of the members of the State Board of Education to serve as chairperson. Said board shall appoint such committees as may be convenient or necessary in the transaction of its business. The Commissioner of Education shall serve as secretary to the board and said commissioner may appoint an assistant secretary, provided neither of them shall be members of the board. The commissioner shall record all acts of the board and certify the same to all concerned and shall be the custodian of its records and papers; shall prepare such routine business for presentation to said board as may be necessary or advisable; shall compile and publish, under the direction of said board, all regulations and acts which may be required and shall perform such duties as the board prescribes. Said board may appoint, and may prescribe the duties of, such subordinates, agents and employees as it finds necessary in the conduct of its business.
(b) Whenever the term the secretary to the State Board of Education occurs or is referred to in the general statutes, it shall be deemed to mean or refer to the Commissioner of Education.
(1949 Rev., S. 1333; P.A. 77-614, S. 302, 610; P.A. 78-218, S. 2, 3, 212.)
History: P.A. 77-614 provided for selection of chairman by governor rather than by board itself, provided that commissioner of education serve as secretary and have power to appoint assistant secretary and that neither be considered a member, replacing provision for appointment of secretary and assistant by board itself and added Subsec. (b); P.A. 78-218 substituted “chairperson” for “chairman” and deleted provision concerning appointment of agent to “secure the observance of the laws relating to the instruction of children”.
Cited. 152 C. 568; 184 C. 1.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2022 · leading case: State v. Ross, 646 A.2d 1318 (Conn. 1994).
State v. Ross, 646 A.2d 1318 (Conn. 1994). “Tribe, American Constitutional Law (1978) §§ 10-2, 10-3. Under the applicable federal cases, ‘two critical elements must be present for a criminal or penal law to be ex post facto: it must be retrospective, that is, it must apply to events occurring before its enactment, and it…”
Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim, 958 A.2d 210 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). “The plaintiffs final claim on appeal is that the court’s ruling is contrary to the provisions of Practice Book § 10-2 7 because it forces the plaintiff to plead evidence to demonstrate the anticompetitive effect of the defendants’ conduct.”
Bahramian v. Papandrea, 440 A.2d 777 (Conn. 1981). “Under General Statutes §§ 10-2 and 30-2, the governor shall select chairpersons for the state board of education and the liquor control commission, but pursuant to General Statutes § 4-5 the multi-member board and commission are their respective department’s “department head” as…”
Rogan v. Rungee, 140 A.3d 979 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). “" Practice Book § 10-2 ; see Buckman v. People Express, Inc.”
State v. Rollinson, 526 A.2d 1283 (Conn. 1987). “Under the applicable federal cases, “two critical elements must be present for a criminal or penal law to be ex post facto: it must be retrospective, that is, it must apply to events occurring before its enactment, and it must disadvantage the offender affected by it.”
Montanaro v. Gorelick, 807 A.2d 1083 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). “*323 The court concluded that the plaintiffs reply did not satisfy the requirements set forth in Practice Book § 10-2 8 because it did not apprise the defendant of the factual basis for not filing her action within the statutory period.”
State v. Rivera, 200 Conn. App. 487 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). “C Having determined that the court’s admission of a copy of the recording into evidence was based on a correct interpretation of the Code of Evidence, and having declined to exercise our supervisory powers to heighten the requirements for the admission of copies of digital…”
Omega Eng'g, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 908 F. Supp. 1084 (D. Conn. 1995). “); see also 1 White & Summers, supra, § 10-2, at 503 (explaining how "[s]ection 2-714 .”
Town of Wallingford v. Bd. of Educ., 210 A.2d 446 (Conn. 1965). “General Statutes §§ 10-2, 5-3. As previously pointed out, no claim is made that the personnel director has the power to promulgate the civil service regulations.”
Williams Ground Servs., Inc. v. Jordan, 166 A.3d 791 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “ence ; that the plaintiff did not establish that the original documents qualified as summaries of voluminous writings or that the documents from which the summaries were prepared were admissible business records sufficient to satisfy § 10-5 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence ;…”
Williams Ground Servs., Inc. v. Jordan (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “idence; that the plaintiff did not establish that the original documents qualified as summaries of voluminous writings or that the documents from which the summaries were prepared were admissible business records sufficient to satisfy § 10-5 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence;…”
State v. Rivera, 343 Conn. 745 (Conn. 2022). “14 Section 10-2 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence provides: ‘‘A copy of a writing, recording or photograph, is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (A) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or the accuracy of the copy, or (B) under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.