Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-137 (2025)

Authority to make regulations and certify or limit the use of devices and equipment

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The commissioner may make, alter or repeal regulations governing the administration of all statutes relating to motor vehicles and may certify any device or accessory which forms part of any motor vehicle, or of its equipment, as to its compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The commissioner may also limit the use of any device or accessory in any way which appears to him to be required for safety, may authorize the use of any such device or accessory upon the highway and may make, alter or repeal any regulation relating to any such device or accessory in the interest of public safety, provided the commissioner may not limit or prohibit the possession, installation or use of a radar detecting device in any motor vehicle. Violation of any regulation adopted under this subsection shall be an infraction.

(b) The commissioner may enter into an agreement with the Automotive Manufacturer Equipment Compliance Agency by which the commissioner shall accept the agency's certification of any equipment including but not limited to components, parts, material and assemblies. Such certification shall permit the legal sale and use of such equipment.

(1949 Rev., S. 2461; 1971, P.A. 577; 597; P.A. 83-312; P.A. 92-256, S. 6; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-11, S. 50, 70; P.A. 96-167, S. 33.)

History: 1971 acts clarified limitations on devices and accessories and authorizations for their use via regulations in the interest of public safety and added provisions re agreements with American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators; P.A. 83-312 amended Subsec. (a) by providing that violation of a regulation adopted thereunder shall be an infraction; P.A. 92-256 amended Subsec. (a) to add proviso that the commissioner may not limit or prohibit the possession, installation or use of a radar detecting device; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-11 changed effective date of P.A. 92-256 but did not affect the date applicable to this section; P.A. 96-167 amended Subsec. (b) to substitute “Automotive Manufacturer Equipment Compliance Agency” for “American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators”.

Cited. 169 C. 267.

Cited. 8 CA 578; 30 CA 922.

Cited. 35 CS 659; 36 CS 551.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–1993 · leading case: State v. Anonymous (1979-3), 35 Conn. Supp. 659 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1978).
State v. Anonymous (1979-3), 35 Conn. Supp. 659 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1978). · cites it 4× “The trial court found the defendant guilty of a violation of § 14-137-1 of the regulations of the commissioner of motor vehicles, which pertains to radar detection devices and which was issued under the authority of General Statutes §14-137 (a). 1 From that judgment the…”
State v. Williams, 513 A.2d 758 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986). · cites it 6× “That regulation, which was promulgated pursuant to General Statutes § 14-137, prohibits the installation or use of any device designed to give advance information to a motorist of the use of a radar speed-indicating *579 instrument in the area of the highway which the motorist…”
State v. Anonymous (1980-8), 36 Conn. Supp. 551 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1980). · cites it 3× “General Statutes § 14-137 (a), the statutory authority for promulgation of regulation § 14-137-1 by the commissioner, does not constitute an invalid delegation of legislative power because of the lack of adequate standards.”
State v. Baran, 621 A.2d 328 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). · cites it 4× “The defendant appeals from his conviction under General Statutes § 14-137 as implemented by § 14-137-1 of the'regulations of the motor vehicle commissioner, which prohibits the installation or operation of a radar detector on Connecticut highways.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.