Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-21 (2026)
Number plates for amateur radio licensees
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The commissioner shall, upon request, upon the registration of a passenger motor vehicle, motorcycle, camper, motor vehicle used for commercial purposes or passenger and commercial motor vehicle owned by any holder of an amateur radio station license issued by the Federal Communications Commission, issue special number plates bearing the official call letters of such radio station as assigned by the Federal Communications Commission. Each application for such special number plates shall be accompanied by proof satisfactory to the commissioner that the applicant currently holds such a license.
(1955, S. 1289d; P.A. 80-38; P.A. 90-263, S. 59, 74.)
History: P.A. 80-38 included plates for motorcycles, campers, commercial or passenger and commercial vehicles in provisions; P.A. 90-263 substituted motor vehicle used for commercial purposes for commercial motor vehicle.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: State v. Anthony, 528 S.E.2d 321 (N.C. 2000).
State v. Anthony, 528 S.E.2d 321 (N.C. 2000). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (Supp.1977) (repealed 1979).”
State v. Blackstock, 333 S.E.2d 245 (N.C. 1985). “C.G.S. § 14-21 before its repeal and replacement by our current rape statute, N.”
State v. McKoy, 394 S.E.2d 426 (N.C. 1990). “C.G.S. § 14-21, a statute invalidated by Furman and revived temporarily by Waddell .”
State v. Avery, 261 S.E.2d 803 (N.C. 1980). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (1953). [15] See generally the sources cited in notes 5-9, and note 11 supra.”
State v. Banks, 370 S.E.2d 398 (N.C. 1988). “In concluding that the testimony was properly admitted we said: Since the age of a defendant is a fact peculiarly within his own knowledge, the state must be left some latitude within which to carry its burden of proof on this issue.”
State v. Burton, 442 S.E.2d 384 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (repealed effective 1 January 1980).”
State v. Ward, 792 S.E.2d 579 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016). “C.G.S. § 14-21, the result is a strict liability offense .”
State v. Johnson, 347 S.E.2d 7 (N.C. 1986). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (repealed 1979). Case law interpreted this statutory language as follows: ‘The terms “carnal knowledge” and “sexual intercourse” are synonymous.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-21(a)(2) — 1 case
State v. Banks, 370 S.E.2d 398 (N.C. 1988). “In concluding that the testimony was properly admitted we said: Since the age of a defendant is a fact peculiarly within his own knowledge, the state must be left some latitude within which to carry its burden of proof on this issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.