Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-21 (2026)

Number plates for amateur radio licensees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The commissioner shall, upon request, upon the registration of a passenger motor vehicle, motorcycle, camper, motor vehicle used for commercial purposes or passenger and commercial motor vehicle owned by any holder of an amateur radio station license issued by the Federal Communications Commission, issue special number plates bearing the official call letters of such radio station as assigned by the Federal Communications Commission. Each application for such special number plates shall be accompanied by proof satisfactory to the commissioner that the applicant currently holds such a license.

(1955, S. 1289d; P.A. 80-38; P.A. 90-263, S. 59, 74.)

History: P.A. 80-38 included plates for motorcycles, campers, commercial or passenger and commercial vehicles in provisions; P.A. 90-263 substituted motor vehicle used for commercial purposes for commercial motor vehicle.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: State v. Anthony, 528 S.E.2d 321 (N.C. 2000).
State v. Anthony, 528 S.E.2d 321 (N.C. 2000). · cites it 6× “C.G.S. § 14-21 (Supp.1977) (repealed 1979).”
State v. Blackstock, 333 S.E.2d 245 (N.C. 1985). · cites it 3× “C.G.S. § 14-21 before its repeal and replacement by our current rape statute, N.”
State v. McKoy, 394 S.E.2d 426 (N.C. 1990). · cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 14-21, a statute invalidated by Furman and revived temporarily by Waddell .”
State v. Avery, 261 S.E.2d 803 (N.C. 1980). · cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 14-21 (1953). [15] See generally the sources cited in notes 5-9, and note 11 supra.”
State v. Banks, 370 S.E.2d 398 (N.C. 1988). · cites it 2× “In concluding that the testimony was properly admitted we said: Since the age of a defendant is a fact peculiarly within his own knowledge, the state must be left some latitude within which to carry its burden of proof on this issue.”
State v. Burton, 442 S.E.2d 384 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (repealed effective 1 January 1980).”
State v. Ward, 792 S.E.2d 579 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016). “C.G.S. § 14-21, the result is a strict liability offense .”
State v. Johnson, 347 S.E.2d 7 (N.C. 1986). “C.G.S. § 14-21 (repealed 1979). Case law interpreted this statutory language as follows: ‘The terms “carnal knowledge” and “sexual intercourse” are synonymous.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-21(a)(2) — 1 case
State v. Banks, 370 S.E.2d 398 (N.C. 1988). “In concluding that the testimony was properly admitted we said: Since the age of a defendant is a fact peculiarly within his own knowledge, the state must be left some latitude within which to carry its burden of proof on this issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.