Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-266 (2025)

Operating vehicles of over four tons' capacity on restricted highways

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The Commissioner of Transportation may restrict the use of motor vehicles of over four tons' capacity on any state highway or portion thereof which, in his opinion, would be seriously injured by such use. No person shall operate any such motor vehicle on any such restricted highway or portion thereof. Any person who violates any provision of this section shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars.

(1949 Rev., S. 2499; 1969, P.A. 768, S. 148; P.A. 90-263, S. 25, 74.)

History: 1969 act replaced highway commissioner with commissioner of transportation; P.A. 90-263 deleted reference to commercial motor vehicles.

Cited. 22 CS 489.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1961–2007 · leading case: State v. Hackett, 804 A.2d 225 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).
State v. Hackett, 804 A.2d 225 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “…General Statutes § 14-248a (public highway); General Statutes § 14-257 (public highway, other public place); General Statutes § 14-261 (public highway); General Statutes § 14-262 (highway, bridge); General Statutes § 14-264 (highway, bridge); General Statutes § 14-266…”
Gold Diggers, LLC v. Town of Berlin, Conn., 469 F. Supp. 2d 43 (D. Conn. 2007). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to section 14-266 of the Ordinance, plaintiff Massa brought an appeal to the Town Council.”
State v. Salone, 1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 99 (Conn. App. Ct. 1961). “See §§ 14-266, 14-268, 14-269, and 14-270 of the General Statutes.”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-266(e): 1 case
Gold Diggers, LLC v. Town of Berlin, Conn., 469 F. Supp. 2d 43 (D. Conn. 2007). “Pursuant to section 14-266 of the Ordinance, plaintiff Massa brought an appeal to the Town Council.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.