Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-5 (2026)

Branch offices

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commissioner shall have exclusive charge of the control and maintenance of the branch offices of the Department of Motor Vehicles, and the expense of leasing and maintaining the same shall be paid out of the appropriation for said department.

(1949 Rev., S. 2354.)

History: (Revisor's note: In 1997 references throughout the general statutes to “Motor Vehicle(s) Commissioner” and “Motor Vehicle(s) Department” were replaced editorially by the Revisors with “Commissioner of Motor Vehicles” or “Department of Motor Vehicles”, as the case may be, for consistency with customary statutory usage).

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: Town of Branford v. Barbara, 988 A.2d 221 (Conn. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Town of Branford v. Barbara, 988 A.2d 221 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “…the usage of ‘civil action’ that is found in the statute.” Id., 180. We then concluded that because Practice Book §§ 14-5 14 and 14-6, formerly Practice Book, 1978-97, §§ 255 and 256, respectively, define a tax appeal as a civil action, the trial court properly awarded…”

Chestnut Point Realty, LLC v. Town of E. Windsor, 153 A.3d 636 (Conn. 2017). “3d 1229 ; see Practice Book §§ 14-5 and 14-6 ; see also Cales v. Office of Victim Services , supra, 319 Conn.”

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Law, 937 A.2d 675 (Conn. 2007). “2d 1001 (1995); see Practice Book § 14-5; they differ from other administrative appeals because only tax appeals are trials de novo.”

D'ADDARIO v. Comm'r of Transp., 429 A.2d 890 (Conn. 1980). “14, 1979); Calamari & Perillo, Contracts § 14-5 (2d Ed. 1977); 5 Corbin, Contracts § 997 (1964).”

Nine State Street, LLC v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 850 A.2d 1032 (Conn. 2004). “” Relying on Practice Book § 14-5, which characterizes an appeal taken pursuant to chapter 124 of the General Statutes, which includes § 8-8, as an administrative appeal, the defendants contend that zoning appeals are not to be considered civil actions.”

State v. Suites, 427 S.E.2d 318 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Thus, the new legislation alleviated the requirement that conviction of the principal had to precede conviction of the accessory. State v. Ludwick, 61 N.C. 400, 404 (1868).”

Chestnut Point Realty, LLC v. East Windsor (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). “4 Practice Book § 14-5 provides in relevant part: ‘‘For the purposes of these rules, administrative appeals are those appeals taken pursuant to statute from decisions of .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.